Categories

A sample text widget

Etiam pulvinar consectetur dolor sed malesuada. Ut convallis euismod dolor nec pretium. Nunc ut tristique massa.

Nam sodales mi vitae dolor ullamcorper et vulputate enim accumsan. Morbi orci magna, tincidunt vitae molestie nec, molestie at mi. Nulla nulla lorem, suscipit in posuere in, interdum non magna.

Fitch Upgrades 7 Classes of Wachovia CRE CDO 2006-1

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–

Fitch Ratings has upgraded seven classes of Wachovia CRE CDO 2006-1, Ltd. (Wachovia CRE CDO 2006-1). Fitch’s performance expectation incorporates prospective views regarding commercial real estate market value and cash flow declines. A detailed list of rating actions follows at the end of this release.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

The upgrades reflect the significant delevering of the capital structure and Fitch’s better than average base case expected loss of 6.2% for the CDO. Since the last rating action, classes A though G have paid in full from the disposal of 19 loan or CMBS interests as well as asset amortization. There were no realized losses over the same period as all assets were removed or paid off at or above par. Further, in August 2014, the asset manager surrendered portions of classes B through N for cancellation. Between built par and the surrendered notes, the CDO is significantly over collateralized by $166 million, as of the Feb 2015 trustee report.

As of February 2015, CDO collateral consisted of the following: whole loans/A-notes (82%), CMBS (3.6%), and cash (14.4%). The approximately $40 million in principal proceeds are expected to be used to further pay down classes H through K.

The CDO collateral continues to become more concentrated. There are interests in approximately 14 different assets contributed to the CDO. The current combined percentage of defaulted assets and Loans of Concern is 38%.

Under Fitch’s methodology, approximately 68.1% of the portfolio is modeled to default in the base case stress scenario, defined as the ‘B’ stress. Modeled recoveries are well above average due to the, generally, stabilized nature of the collateral and the senior position of the majority of the debt.

The largest contributor to base case loss is a whole loan (20.6% of the pool) secured by a 402,000 sf retail center located in Glen Mills, PA. As of 9/30/14, occupancy was 96.7%. The largest tenants are Home Depot through 2033 and Marshalls through 2018. The loan, which matures on March 31, 2015, is over leveraged and Fitch modeled a loss in its base case scenario.

This transaction was analyzed according to the ‘Surveillance Criteria for U.S. CREL CDOs’, which applies stresses to property cash flows and debt service coverage ratio tests to project future default levels for the underlying portfolio. Recoveries are based on stressed cash flows and Fitch’s long-term capitalization rates. The default levels were then compared to the breakeven levels generated by Fitch’s cash flow model of the CDO under the various defaults timing and interest rate stress scenarios as described in the report ‘Global Rating Criteria for Structured Finance CDOs’. The breakeven rates for classes H through O pass the cash flow model at or above the ratings listed below. Upgrades to classes M though O were limited due to the increasing concentration of the portfolio.

The Stable Outlooks generally the significant credit enhancement to the classes and positive cushion in the modeling.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

If the collateral continues to repay at or near par, classes may be upgraded further.

Wachovia CRE CDO 2006-1 is a CRE CDO managed by Structured Asset Investors, LLC with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., successor-by-merger to Wachovia Bank, N.A., as sub-advisor. The CDO exited its reinvestment period in September 2011.

Fitch upgrades the following classes as indicated:

–$15 million class H notes to ‘AAAsf’ from ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–$13 million class J notes to ‘AAAsf’ from ‘BBBsf’; Outlook Stable;

–$10.95 million class K notes to ‘AAAsf’ from ‘BBBsf’; Outlook Stable;

–$5 million class L notes to ‘AAAsf’ from ‘BBBsf’; Outlook Stable;

–$21.75 million class M notes to ‘Asf’ from ‘BBsf’; Outlook Stable;

–$6.9 million class N notes to ‘Asf’ from ‘Bsf’; Outlook Stable;

–$6.5 million class O notes to ‘Asf’ from ‘Bsf’; Outlook Stable.

Classes A through G have paid in full. The preferred shares are not rated.

Additional information is available at ‘www.fitchratings.com‘.

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

–‘Surveillance Criteria for U.S. CREL CDOs’ (November 2014);

–‘Global Rating Criteria for Structured Finance CDOs’ (July 2014);

–‘Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria’ (August 2014).

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

Surveillance Criteria for U.S. CREL CDOs

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=811268

Global Rating Criteria for Structured Finance CDOs

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=751136

Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=754389

Additional Disclosure

Solicitation Status

http://www.fitchratings.com/gws/en/disclosure/solicitation?pr_id=981153

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTP://FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY’S PUBLIC WEBSITE ‘WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM‘. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH’S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE ‘CODE OF CONDUCT’ SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.

Investment & Company InformationFinanceFitch RatingsCDO Contact:

Fitch Ratings

Primary Surveillance Analyst

Stacey McGovern

Director

+1-212-908-0722

Fitch Ratings, Inc.

33 Whitehall Street

New York, NY 10004

or

Committee Chairperson

Mary MacNeill

Managing Director

+1-212-908-0785

or

Media Relations

Sandro Scenga, +1 212-908-0278

sandro.scenga@fitchratings.com […]

Fitch Affirms Wisconsin's $764MM Clean Water Rev Bonds at 'AA+'; Outlook Stable

CHICAGO–(BUSINESS WIRE)–

Fitch Ratings affirms its ‘AA+’ rating on the following outstanding bonds issued by the state of Wisconsin (the state):

–$764 million clean water revenue bonds.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.

SECURITY

The bonds are secured by pledged loan repayments, amounts in the reserve and subsidy funds, and other pledged amounts.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

SOLID FINANCIAL STRUCTURE: Fitch’s cash flow modeling demonstrates that the state’s Clean Water Fund Program (CWFP) can continue to pay bond debt service even if there were loan defaults in excess of Fitch’s stress test without causing bond payment interruptions.

STATE OF WISCONSIN EXPOSURE: Significant portions of CWFP’s bond debt service are subsidized by general obligation (GO) bond repayments issued by the state of Wisconsin (GOs rated ‘AA’ with a Stable Outlook by Fitch) and are required to provide 1.0x coverage. This structural reliance on the state to provide subsidies limits the program’s rating to ‘AA+’.

STRONG PORTFOLIO QUALITY WITH INTERCEPT: Borrower loan provisions are strong, with most of loan principal secured by general obligation or water/sewer system revenue pledges. Approximately 67% of the CWFP’s loan portfolio is estimated to be investment grade by Fitch. This is due in part to the program’s ability to intercept state aid payments otherwise due to delinquent borrowers. The state aid intercept reduces the risk of program debt service shortfalls.

HIGH SINGLE-BORROWER CONCENTRATION REMAINS: The pledged pool consists of 187 borrowers, with the top 10 participants representing approximately 73% of the total portfolio. The largest participant, Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewer District (MMSD), represents a significant 31% of the total portfolio. MMSD’s high credit rating (GO debt rated ‘AAA’ with a Stable Outlook) mitigates this concentration risk.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN PROGRAM ENHANCEMENT: A measurable decline in pledged resources including quality of invested reserves and loan subsidy from the state could pressure the rating. The Stable Outlook reflects Fitch’s view that these events are not likely to occur.

CREDIT PROFILE

The state issues revolving fund revenue bonds under its leveraged portfolio to fund clean water loans for various governmental entities throughout the state. In addition, the state, through the Department of Administration (DOA), operates separate direct and proprietary loan portfolios for loans also made to governmental entities for clean water projects. The direct loan portfolio is funded from federal capitalization grants, required state match amounts, and recycled loan repayments while the proprietary portfolio is funded from state GO bond proceeds as well as recycled payments. Only loan repayments from the leveraged portfolio are pledged to CWF bondholders. Fitch considers a credit strength the DOA’s ability to sell or exchange loans between portfolios to avoid delinquencies in the leveraged portfolio.

FINANCIAL STRUCTURE EXHIBITS STRONG DEFAULT TOLERANCE

The CWFP’s scheduled loan repayments are projected to provide minimum debt service coverage of 1.0x, which does not include approximately $105 million in pledged reserves. Overall, Fitch calculates the program’s asset strength ratio (PASR) to be 1.2x, which is slightly weaker than Fitch’s median for the state revolving fund (SRF) sector of 1.8x. The PASR includes total scheduled loan repayments and all other pledged resources divided by total scheduled bond debt service.

Fitch’s cash flow modeling demonstrates that the SRF program can continue to pay bond debt service even with hypothetical loan defaults of 100% over the first, middle and last four-year period of the bonds’ life. This is in excess of Fitch’s ‘AAA’ liability stress hurdle of 30% produced by the portfolio stress calculator. The liability stress hurdle is calculated based on overall pool credit quality as measured by the rating of underlying borrowers, size, and loan term. Despite the ability of the program to meet Fitch’s ‘AAA’ liability default hurdle, structural reliance on state subsidies currently limits the program rating to an ‘AA+’.

The state subsidizes approximately 22% of the CWFP’s debt service costs in the form of state GO debt service payments of outstanding bonds purchased for the program. The purchased bonds (and repayments) are held in the subsidy fund by the trustee. This contribution reduces local borrowing costs by allowing a lower yield on the underlying loans than the yield on the bonds. The corpus of the subsidy fund GOs currently totals approximately about $161 million, or about 21% of outstanding bonds, and is available to cure debt service deficiencies if reserve funds are insufficient.

The program’s loan credit reserve fund is sized based on the estimated credit quality of the loan portfolio and is available to cure debt service deficiencies. The state must cure reserve fund shortfalls before additional loan disbursements or bond issuances. In addition, defaulting borrowers must replenish any reserve draws. As of Jan. 28, 2015, the loan credit reserve fund totaled approximately $105.6 million (14% of outstanding bonds), which is slightly greater than the current minimum requirement of $102.3 million.

The reserves are invested in the state’s investment pool, forward-delivery agreements providing for the delivery of U.S. treasury securities, a collateralized repurchase agreement and Wisconsin GO bonds. Pursuant to the CWFP documents, the reserves must be invested with institutions or instruments that are rated at least as high as the rating category on the clean water revenue bonds at the time the funds were initially invested.

STATE AID INTERCEPT PROVISION CONTRIBUTES TO STRONG POOL QUALITY

Fitch estimates that at least 67% of the pool’s loans are to investment-grade borrowers, including borrowers rated off the state’s GO rating by virtue of state aid credit enhancement. In the event a borrower becomes delinquent, the DOA must intercept that entity’s state aid payments – including state-shared revenues paid to cities, villages, and towns – and transportation aid, where available. The CWFP currently asserts priority over other agencies for intercepted funds, which is viewed by Fitch as a structural positive for bondholders. Fitch uses an assumed ‘AA-‘ rating for borrowers meeting Fitch’s state aid intercept criteria in determining the composite portfolio stress hurdle.

The program’s loan security is solid with approximately 64% of loan principal backed by GO pledges and remaining loans backed by water/sewer system revenue pledges. A minimum coverage ratio of 1.1x is required for new revenue-backed loans. Final loan maturity generally does not exceed 20 years, and level debt service schedules are typical, with principal amortization beginning one year after project completion.

Unpaid system fees must be added by municipalities as a special charge to the property tax bill of the delinquent user. Under the individual loan agreements, the DOA may appoint receivers to take over troubled projects. An internal database is used to track compliance. Additionally, each borrower’s audited financials are monitored on an annual basis. To date, there has not been a permanent loan default.

LOAN POOL EXHIBITS MODERATE-TO-HIGH CONCENTRATION

The combined pledged loan pool is composed of approximately 187 loans, with the top 10 obligors representing approximately 73% of the aggregate loan pool. MMSD, the largest borrower, represents about 31% of the total pledged portfolio. Fitch views overall pool concentration as moderate to high. Each of the remaining pool participants represents no more than approximately 4% of the total pool.

The state also presents a degree of concentration risk to the program structure because of its reliance on state subsidies to cover debt service in the form of state GO bond repayments. As of Jan. 28, 2015, expected state subsidy amounts totaled approximately 22% of total debt.

Additional information is available at ‘www.fitchratings.com‘.

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

–‘Revenue-Supported Rating Criteria’ (June 16, 2014);

–‘State Revolving Fund and Leveraged Municipal Loan Pool Criteria’ (Oct. 22, 2014) .

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

Revenue-Supported Rating Criteria

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=750012

State Revolving Fund and Leveraged Municipal Loan Pool Criteria

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=792908

Additional Disclosure

Solicitation Status

http://www.fitchratings.com/gws/en/disclosure/solicitation?pr_id=979478

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTP://FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY’S PUBLIC WEBSITE ‘WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM‘. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH’S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE ‘CODE OF CONDUCT’ SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.

BondsSecurity Upgrades & DowngradesFitch Ratings Contact:

Fitch Ratings

Primary Analyst

Adrienne M. Booker

Senior Director

+1-312-368-5471

Fitch Ratings, Inc.

70 West Madison Street

Chicago, IL 60602

or

Secondary Analyst

Major Parkhurst

Director

+1-512-215-3724

or

Committee Chairperson

Jessalynn Moro

Managing Director

+1-212-908-0608

or

Media Relations:

Elizabeth Fogerty, New York, +1 212-908-0526

Email:

elizabeth.fogerty@fitchratings.com […]

Fitch Affirms Iowa Student Loan Liquidity Corp Series 2005-1

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–

Fitch Ratings affirms the ‘AAAsf’ rating on the senior notes and the ‘A+’ rating on the subordinate notes issued by Iowa Student Loan Liquidity Corporation (Iowa Student Loan) student loan asset-backed notes, series 2005-1. The Rating Outlook remains Stable for the senior and subordinate notes. A detailed list of rating actions follows at the end of this press release.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

High Collateral Quality:

The collateral consists of 100% of Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP) loans. The credit quality of the trust collateral is high, in Fitch’s opinion, based on the guarantees provided by the transaction’s eligible guarantors and reinsurance provided by the U.S. Department of Education (ED) for at least 97% of principal and accrued interest. Fitch currently rates the U.S. sovereign ‘AAA’ with a Stable Outlook.

Sufficient Credit Enhancement (CE):

While both the senior and subordinate notes will benefit from overcollateralization (OC; the excess of trust’s asset balance over bond balance) and excess spread, the senior notes also benefit from subordination provided by the class B note. As of September 2014, total parity is 101.77% (1.74% CE) and senior parity is 118.63% (15.70% CE). Although total parity is 101.77%, Fitch only gives credit to the 100.50% cash release level.

Adequate Liquidity Support:

Liquidity support is provided by a debt service reserve fund sized at the greater of 0.50% of the outstanding pool balance and $1,014,938.

Acceptable Servicing Capabilities:

As of Jan. 1, 2014, servicing for the Iowa Student Loan Liquidity Corporation (ISL) 2005-1 trust was transferred to ISL’s subsidiary, Aspire Resources, Inc. Fitch believes Aspire Resources, Inc. is an acceptable servicer of FFELP student loans.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Since FFELP student loan ABS rely on the U.S. government to reimburse defaults, ‘AAAsf’ FFELP ABS ratings will likely move in tandem with the ‘AAA’ U.S. sovereign rating. Aside from the U.S. sovereign rating, defaults and basis risk account for the majority of the risk embedded in FFELP student loan transactions. Additional defaults and basis shock beyond Fitch’s published stresses could result in future downgrades. Likewise, a buildup of credit enhancement driven by positive excess spread given favorable basis factor conditions could lead to future upgrades.

Fitch has affirmed the following ratings:

Iowa Student Loan Liquidity Corporation 2005-1

–Senior class A-2 notes at ‘AAAsf’; Outlook Stable;

–Senior class A-3 notes at ‘AAAsf’; Outlook Stable;

–Subordinate class B notes at ‘A+sf’; Outlook Stable.

Additional information is available at ‘www.fitchratings.com‘.

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

–‘Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria’ dated August 2014;

–‘Rating U.S. Federal Family Education Loan Program Student Loan ABS Criteria’ dated June 2014.

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=754389

Rating U.S. Federal Family Education Loan Program Student Loan ABS Criteria

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=750530

Additional Disclosure

Solicitation Status

http://www.fitchratings.com/gws/en/disclosure/solicitation?pr_id=979313

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTP://FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY’S PUBLIC WEBSITE ‘WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM‘. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH’S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE ‘CODE OF CONDUCT’ SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.

Security Upgrades & DowngradesFinanceFitch Ratingsstudent loan Contact:

Fitch Ratings

Primary Analyst

Jeffrey Prackup

Director

+1-212-908-0839

Fitch Ratings, Inc.

33 Whitehall Street

New York, NY 10004

or

Secondary Analyst

Harry Kohl

Associate Director

+1-212-908-0837

or

Committee Chairperson

Tracy Wan

Senior Director

+1-212-908-9171

or

Media Relations:

Sandro Scenga, New York, +1 212-908-0278

Email:

sandro.scenga@fitchratings.com […]

Fitch Affirms Nelnet Student Loan Trust 2006-3 Notes

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–

Fitch Ratings has affirmed the Nelnet Student Loan Trust 2006-3 senior and subordinate notes at ‘AAAsf’ and ‘A+sf’, respectively. The Rating Outlook remains Stable.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

High Collateral Quality: The trust collateral comprises Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP) loans with guaranties provided by eligible guarantors and reinsurance provided by the U.S. Department of Education (ED) for at least 97% of principal and accrued interest. Fitch’s current U.S. sovereign rating is ‘AAA’ with a Stable Outlook.

Credit Enhancement: Credit Enhancement is provided by overcollateralization, excess spread, and for the class A notes, subordination provided by the class B notes. As of November 2014, the senior and total parities are 105.15% and 100.41%, respectively. Excess cash will continue to be released from the trust as long as the overcollateralization level is maintained.

Adequate Liquidity Support: Liquidity support is provided by a reserve account, determined as the greater of 0.25% of the pool balance and $3,294,279.

Acceptable Servicing Capabilities: Nelnet Inc. as the servicer is responsible for the day-to-day servicing of this trust. In Fitch’s opinion, Nelnet is an acceptable servicer of FFELP student loans.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Since the FFELP student loan ABS relies on the U.S. government to reimburse defaults, ‘AAAsf’ FFELP ABS ratings will likely move in tandem with the ‘AAA’ U.S. sovereign rating. Aside from the U.S. sovereign rating, defaults and basis risk account for the majority of the risk embedded in FFELP student loan transactions. Additional defaults and basis shock beyond Fitch’s published stresses could result in future downgrades. Likewise, a buildup of CE driven by positive excess spread given favorable basis factor conditions could lead to future upgrades.

Fitch has affirmed the following ratings:

Nelnet Student Loan Trust 2006-3:

–Class A-4 at ‘AAAsf’; Outlook Stable;

–Class A-5 at ‘AAAsf’; Outlook Stable;

–Class A-6 at ‘AAAsf’; Outlook Stable;

–Class B at ‘A+sf’; Outlook Stable.

Additional information is available at ‘www.fitchratings.com‘.

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

–‘Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria’ (Aug. 4, 2014);

–‘Rating U.S. Federal Family Education Loan Program Student Loan ABS Criteria’ (June 23, 2014).

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

Rating U.S. Federal Family Education Loan Program Student Loan ABS Criteria

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=750530

Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=754389

Additional Disclosure

Solicitation Status

http://www.fitchratings.com/gws/en/disclosure/solicitation?pr_id=979254

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTP://FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY’S PUBLIC WEBSITE ‘WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM‘. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH’S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE ‘CODE OF CONDUCT’ SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.

Security Upgrades & DowngradesFinanceFitch RatingsFFELP Contact:

Fitch Ratings

Media Relations

Sandro Scenga, New York, +1-212-908-0278

sandro.scenga@fitchratings.com

or

Primary Analyst

Harry Kohl, +1-212-908-0837

Associate Director

Fitch Ratings, Inc.

33 Whitehall Street

New York, NY 10004

or

Committee Chairperson

Tracy Wan, +1-212-908-9171

Senior Director

[…]

Fitch Affirms Rhode Island Student Loan Authority 2009 Trust

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–

Fitch Ratings affirms the ratings of the bonds issued by the Rhode Island Student Loan Authority (RISLA) 2009 Trust at ‘Asf’. The Outlook remains Stable.

A detailed list of rating actions follows at the end of this press release.

The affirmations are based on a sufficient level of enhancement to cover the applicable risk factor stresses. The collateral consists of 100% private student loans.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Adequate Collateral Quality: The trust is collateralized by approximately $147.1 million of private student loans as of September 2014. The loans were originated under the Rhode Island Family Education Loan program by RISLA. The projected rating defaults are expected to range between 9%-11% as a percentage of the current pool balance. A recovery rate of 55% was applied which was determined to be appropriate based on data provided by the issuer.

Sufficient Credit Enhancement (CE): CE is provided by overcollateralization (OC; the excess of trust’s asset balance over bond balance) and excess spread. Total parity is currently 110.36% as of September 2014. Cash may be released to the issuer until Dec. 1, 2017 provided that parity exceeds 121%.

Satisfactory Servicing Capabilities: Day-to-day servicing is provided by RISLA. Fitch believes the servicing operations are acceptable at this time.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

As Fitch’s base case default proxy is derived primarily from historical collateral performance, actual performance may differ from the expected performance, resulting in higher loss levels than the base case. This will result in a decline in CE and remaining loss coverage levels available to the notes and may make certain note ratings susceptible to potential negative rating actions, depending on the extent of the decline in coverage. Fitch will continue to monitor the performance of the trust.

A comparison of the transaction’s Representations, Warranties and Enforcement Mechanisms (RW&E) to those of typical RW&Es for that asset class is available at www.fitchratings.com

Fitch affirms the following ratings:

Rhode Island Student Loan Authority Series 2009

–Serial 2015 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2016 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2017 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2017* at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2018 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2019 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2019* at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2020 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2021 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2022 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Term 2030 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable.

Rhode Island Student Loan Authority Series 2010A

–Serial 2015 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2016 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2017 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2018 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2019 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2020 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2021 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2022 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2023 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2024 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2025 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2026 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable.

Rhode Island Student Loan Authority Series 2010B

–Serial 2015 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2016 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2017 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2018 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2019 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2020 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2021 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2022 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2023 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2024 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2025 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable.

Rhode Island Student Loan Authority Series 2012A

–Serial 2015 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2016 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2017 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2018 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2019 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2020 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2021 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2022 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2023 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2024 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2025 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable.

Rhode Island Student Loan Authority Series 2013A

–Serial 2015 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2016 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2017 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2018 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2019 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2020 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2021 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2022 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2023 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2024 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2025 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2026 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2027 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Serial 2028 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

Rhode Island Student Loan Authority Series 2014

–A(2015) at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–A(2016) at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–A(2017) at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–A(2018) at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–A(2019) at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–A(2020) at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–A(2021) at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–A(2022) at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–A(2023) at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–A(2024) at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–A(2025) at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–A(2026) at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–A(2027) at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–A(2028) at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–A(2029) at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable.

Additional information is available at ‘www.fitchratings.com‘.

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

–‘U.S. Private Student Loan ABS Criteria’ (Jan. 29, 2014);

–‘Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria’ (Aug. 4, 2014);

–‘Representations, Warranties, and Enforcement Mechanisms in Global Structured Finance Transactions’ (Oct. 31, 2014);

–‘Rhode Island Student Loan Authority 2014 Senior Series A–Appendix’ (April 1, 2014).

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

U.S. Private Student Loan ABS Criteria

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=730956

Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=754389

Representations, Warranties and Enforcement Mechanisms in Global Structured Finance Transactions

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=799248

Rhode Island Student Loan Authority 2014 Senior Series A — Appendix

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=739055

Additional Disclosure

Solicitation Status

http://www.fitchratings.com/gws/en/disclosure/solicitation?pr_id=978947

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTP://FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY’S PUBLIC WEBSITE ‘WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM‘. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH’S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE ‘CODE OF CONDUCT’ SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.

Investment & Company InformationFinanceFitch Ratings Contact:

Fitch Ratings

Primary Analyst

Charlene M. Davis

Director

+1 212-908-0213

Fitch Ratings, Inc.

33 Whitehall St.

New York, NY 10004

or

Committee Chairperson

Tracy Wan

Senior Director

+1 212-908-9171

or

Media Relations:

Sandro Scenga, +1 212-908-0278

sandro.scenga@fitchratings.com […]

Fitch Affirms KeyCorp Student Loan Trust 2006-A (Group I) Notes

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–

Fitch Ratings has affirmed the KeyCorp Student Loan Trust 2006-A (Group I) senior and subordinate notes at ‘AAAsf’ and ‘A+sf’, respectively. The Rating Outlook remains Stable.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

High Collateral Quality: The trust collateral is comprised of Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP) loans with guaranties provided by eligible guarantors and reinsurance provided by the U.S. Department of Education (ED) for at least 97% of principal and accrued interest. Fitch’s current U.S. sovereign rating is ‘AAA’ with a Stable Rating Outlook.

Sufficient Credit Enhancement: CE is provided by overcollateralization (OC; the excess of trust’s asset balance over bond balance), excess spread, and for the class A notes, subordination provided by the class B notes. As of November 2014, total parity is 100.25%, the release level, and senior parity is 105.43%. The parity ratios are expected to stay at this level, as the trust is past the stepdown date, and should continue to release cash.

Adequate Liquidity Support: Liquidity support is provided by a reserve account which is determined as the greater of 0.25% of the pool balance and $345,001. It is currently sized at the floor of $345,001.

Acceptable Servicing Capabilities: KeyBank National Association is the Master Servicer for the transaction, with Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency and Great Lakes Educational Loan Services, Inc. acting as Subservicers. Fitch believes KeyBank National Association, Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency, and Great Lakes Educational Loan Services, Inc. to be acceptable servicers of FFELP student loans.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Since the FFELP student loan ABS relies on the U.S. government to reimburse defaults, ‘AAAsf’ FFELP ABS ratings will likely move in tandem with the ‘AAA’ U.S. sovereign rating. Aside from the U.S. sovereign rating, defaults and basis risk account for the majority of the risk embedded in FFELP student loan transactions. Additional defaults and basis shock beyond Fitch’s published stresses could result in future downgrades. Likewise, a buildup of CE driven by positive excess spread given favorable basis factor conditions could lead to future upgrades.

Fitch has affirmed the following ratings:

KeyCorp Student Loan Trust 2006-A (Group I):

–Class A-2 at ‘AAAsf’; Outlook Stable;

–Class B at ‘A+sf’; Outlook Stable.

Additional information is available at ‘www.fitchratings.com‘.

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

–‘Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria’ (Aug. 4, 2014);

–‘Rating U.S. Federal Family Education Loan Program Student Loan ABS Criteria’ (June 23, 2014).

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=754389

Rating U.S. Federal Family Education Loan Program Student Loan ABS Criteria

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=750530

Additional Disclosure

Solicitation Status

http://www.fitchratings.com/gws/en/disclosure/solicitation?pr_id=978599

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTP://FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY’S PUBLIC WEBSITE ‘WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM‘. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH’S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE ‘CODE OF CONDUCT’ SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.

Security Upgrades & DowngradesFinanceFitch Ratings Contact:

Fitch Ratings

Primary Analyst

Harry Kohl

Associate Director

+1-212-908-0837

Fitch Ratings, Inc.

33 Whitehall Street

New York, NY 10004

or

Committee Chairperson

Tracy Wan

Senior Director

+1-212-908-9171

or

Media Relations:

Sandro Scenga, New York, +1 212-908-0278

Email:

sandro.scenga@fitchratings.com […]

Fitch Affirms All Notes Issued by Nelnet Student Loan Trust 2006-2

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–

Fitch Ratings affirms the senior notes at ‘AAAsf’ and the subordinate notes at ‘Asf’ issued by Nelnet Student Loan Trust 2006-2. The Rating Outlook is revised to Negative from Stable for class A-7 and class B notes, the Outlook remains Stable for all remaining notes.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

High Collateral Quality: The trust collateral is comprised of 100% of Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP) loans with guaranties provided by eligible guarantors and reinsurance provided by the U.S. Department of Education (ED) for at least 97% of principal and accrued. Fitch currently rates the U.S. ‘AAA’ with a Stable Outlook.

Credit Enhancement: Credit Enhancement is provided by overcollateralization, excess spread, and for the class A notes, subordination provided by the class B notes. As of the September 2014 report, the total parity 100.08% and senior parity is at 104.62%. Excess cash is currently released from the trust as long as the overcollateralization is maintained.

Adequate Liquidity Support: Liquidity support is provided by a reserve account which is determined as the greater of 0.25% of the pool balance and $3,055,686.03.

Acceptable Servicing Capabilities: Nelnet Inc. as the servicer is responsible for the day-to-day servicing of this trust. In Fitch’s opinion, Nelnet is an acceptable servicer of FFELP student loans.

Outlook Negative: Class A-6 and A-7 notes are reset rate notes, with an initial reset date of April 25, 2018 and April 25, 2016, respectively. If the reset rate notes cannot be successfully remarketed the trust will pay the failed remarketing rate of 0.75%. Additionally, the collateral of this trust is made up of 100% FFELP consolidation loans and Fitch recently revised its default assumptions regarding consolidation loans, extending the default timing curve from five to at least eight years to reflect the industry performance data, which indicated a more even distribution of consolidation loan defaults over a longer period of time. The increased defaults in conjunction with a higher spread could create a scenario in which the class A-7 and class B notes experience a principal and an interest shortfall.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Since the FFELP student loan ABS relies on the U.S. government to reimburse defaults, ‘AAA’sf FFELP ABS ratings will likely move in tandem with the ‘AAA’ U.S. sovereign rating. Aside from the U.S. sovereign rating, defaults and basis risk account for the majority of the risk embedded in FFELP student loan transactions. Additional defaults and basis shock beyond Fitch’s published stresses could result in future downgrades. Likewise, a buildup of credit enhancement driven by positive excess spread given favorable basis factor conditions could lead to future upgrades.

Fitch has affirmed the following ratings:

Nelnet Student Loan Trust 2006-2:

–Class A-4 note at ‘AAAsf’; Outlook Stable;

–Class A-5 note at ‘AAAsf’; Outlook Stable;

–Class A-6 note at ‘AAAsf’; Outlook Stable;

–Class A-7 note at ‘AAAsf’; Outlook revised to Negative from Stable;

–Class B note at ‘Asf’; Outlook revised to Negative from Stable.

Additional information is available at ‘www.fitchratings.com‘.

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

–‘Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria’ dated Aug. 4, 2014;

–‘Rating U.S. Federal Family Education Loan Program Student Loan ABS Criteria’ dated June 23, 2014.

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=754389

Rating U.S. Federal Family Education Loan Program Student Loan ABS Criteria

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=750530

Additional Disclosure

Solicitation Status

http://www.fitchratings.com/gws/en/disclosure/solicitation?pr_id=972135

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTP://FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY’S PUBLIC WEBSITE ‘WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM‘. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH’S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE ‘CODE OF CONDUCT’ SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.

Security Upgrades & DowngradesFinanceFitch RatingsNelnetFFELP Contact:

Fitch Ratings

Primary Analyst

Victoria Ohorodnyk

Associate Director

+1-212-908-0866

Fitch Ratings, Inc.

33 Whitehall Street

New York, NY 10004

or

Committee Chairperson

Tracy Wan

Senior Director

+1-212-908-9171

or

Media Relations:

Sandro Scenga, New York, +1 212-908-0278

Email:

sandro.scenga@fitchratings.com […]

Fitch Affirms Nelnet Student Loan Trust 2006-1

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–

Fitch Ratings has affirmed Nelnet Student Loan Trust 2006-1 senior and subordinate notes at ‘AAAsf’ and ‘Asf’, respectively. The Rating Outlook remains Stable.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

High Collateral Quality: The trust collateral is comprised of Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP) loans with guaranties provided by eligible guarantors and reinsurance provided by the U.S. Department of Education (ED) for at least 97% of principal and accrued interest. Fitch’s current U.S. sovereign rating is ‘AAA’ with a Stable Outlook.

Sufficient Credit Enhancement: Credit enhancement (CE) is provided by excess spread, overcollateralization (OC), and for the class A notes, subordination provided by the class B notes. As of October 2014, the senior and total parities are 104.57% and 100.04% respectively, excluding the supplemental interest fund. Excess Cash is currently being released from the trust; however, the OC must be maintained due to the PDA.

Adequate Liquidity Support: Liquidity support is provided by a reserve account which is determined as the greater of 0.25% of the pool balance and $2,951,197. It is currently sized at the floor of $2,951,197.

Acceptable Servicing Capabilities: Nelnet Inc. as the servicer is responsible for the day-to-day servicing of this trust. In Fitch’s opinion, Nelnet is an acceptable servicer of FFELP student loans.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Since the FFELP student loan ABS relies on the U.S. government to reimburse defaults, ‘AAAsf’ FFELP ABS ratings will likely move in tandem with the ‘AAA’ U.S. sovereign rating. Aside from the U.S. sovereign rating, defaults and basis risk account for the majority of the risk embedded in FFELP student loan transactions. Additional defaults and basis shock beyond Fitch’s published stresses could result in future downgrades. Likewise, a buildup of CE driven by positive excess spread given favorable basis factor conditions could lead to future upgrades.

Fitch has affirmed the following ratings:

Nelnet Student Loan Trust 2006-1 notes:

–Class A-4 at ‘AAAsf’; Outlook Stable;

–Class A-5 at ‘AAAsf’; Outlook Stable;

–Class A-6 at ‘AAAsf’; Outlook Stable;

–Class B-1 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable.

Additional information is available at ‘www.fitchratings.com‘.

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

–‘Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria’ (Aug. 4, 2014);

–‘Rating U.S. Federal Family Education Loan Program Student Loan ABS Criteria’ (June 23, 2014).

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=754389

Rating U.S. Federal Family Education Loan Program Student Loan ABS Criteria

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=750530

Additional Disclosure

Solicitation Status

http://www.fitchratings.com/gws/en/disclosure/solicitation?pr_id=969995

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTP://FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY’S PUBLIC WEBSITE ‘WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM‘. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH’S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE ‘CODE OF CONDUCT’ SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.

Security Upgrades & DowngradesFinanceFitch RatingsFFELP Contact:

Fitch Ratings

Primary Analyst

Harry Kohl

Associate Director

+1-212-908-0837

Fitch Ratings, Inc.

33 Whitehall Street

New York, NY 10004

or

Committee Chairperson

Tracy Wan

Senior Director

+1-212-908-9171

or

Media Relations

Sandro Scenga

+1-212-908-0278

New York

sandro.scenga@fitchratings.com […]

Fitch Affirms SLC Student Loan Trust 2004-1 Sr. and Sub. Notes

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–

Fitch Ratings has affirmed the senior notes of SLC Student Loan Trust 2004-1 at ‘AAAsf’ and subordinate note at ‘Asf’. The Rating Outlook remains Stable for both notes.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

High Collateral Quality: The trust collateral is comprised of 100% of Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP) loans. The credit quality of the trust collateral is high, in Fitch’s opinion, based on the guarantees provided by the transaction’s eligible guarantors and at least 97% reinsurance of principal and accrued interest provided by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). Fitch currently rates the U.S. sovereign ‘AAA’, Outlook Stable.

Sufficient Credit Enhancement (CE): CE is provided by overcollateralization, excess spread and, for the class A notes, subordination provided by the class B notes. The trust, below the 40% pool factor threshold, can release cash as long as total parity, not including the reserve account, is 100.00%. The trust has been releasing cash and maintaining this parity level. Including the reserve account, total and senior parities are 100.39% and 105.39% respectively.

Adequate Liquidity Support: Liquidity support is provided by a reserve account which is determined as the greater of 0.25% of the pool balance and $2,250,000.

Acceptable Servicing Capabilities: Navient Solutions, Inc. (formerly known as Sallie Mae, Inc.) is the servicer of the trust’s student loan pool. In Fitch’s opinion, Navient Solutions, Inc. is an acceptable servicer of FFELP student loans.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Since FFELP student loan ABS rely on the U.S. government to reimburse defaults, ‘AAAsf’ FFELP ABS ratings will likely move in tandem with the ‘AAA’ U.S. sovereign rating. Aside from the U.S. sovereign rating, defaults and basis risk account for the majority of the risk embedded in FFELP student loan transactions. Additional defaults and basis shock beyond Fitch’s published stresses could result in future downgrades. Likewise, a buildup of credit enhancement driven by positive excess spread given favorable basis factor conditions could lead to future upgrades.

Fitch has affirmed the following ratings:

SLC Student Loan Trust Series 2004-1

–Class A-5 notes at ‘AAAsf’; Outlook Stable;

–Class A-6 notes at ‘AAAsf’; Outlook Stable;

–Class A-7 notes at ‘AAAsf’; Outlook Stable;

–Class B note at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable.

Additional information is available at ‘www.fitchratings.com‘.

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

–‘Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria’ dated May 20, 2014;

–‘Rating U.S. Federal Family Education Loan Program Student Loan ABS Criteria’ dated June 23, 2014.

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

Rating U.S. Federal Family Education Loan Program Student Loan ABS Criteria

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=750530

Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=754389

Additional Disclosure

Solicitation Status

http://www.fitchratings.com/gws/en/disclosure/solicitation?pr_id=961555

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTP://FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY’S PUBLIC WEBSITE ‘WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM‘. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH’S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE ‘CODE OF CONDUCT’ SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.

Security Upgrades & DowngradesFinanceFitch Ratings Contact:

Fitch Ratings

Primary Analyst

Lisette Figueroa

+1 212-908-0836

Fitch Ratings, Inc.

33 Whitehall St.

New York, NY 10004

or

Committee Chairperson

Tracy Wan

Senior Director

+1 212-908-9171

or

Media Relations, New York

Elizabeth Fogerty, +1 212-908-0526

elizabeth.fogerty@fitchratings.com […]

Fitch Affirms SLC Student Loan Trust 2005-3 Sr. and Sub. Notes

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–

Fitch Ratings has affirmed the SLC Student Loan Trust 2005-3 senior notes at ‘AAAsf’ and the subordinate note at ‘Asf’. The Rating Outlook remains Stable on both notes.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

High Collateral Quality The trust collateral is comprised of 100% of Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP) loans. The credit quality of the trust collateral is high, in Fitch’s opinion, based on the guarantees provided by the transaction’s eligible guarantors and at least 97% reinsurance of principal and accrued interest provided by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). Fitch currently rates the U.S. sovereign ‘AAA’ with a Stable Rating Outlook.

Sufficient Credit Enhancement

Credit Enhancement is provided by overcollateralization, excess spread and for the class A notes, subordination provided by the class B notes. As of the August 2014 report, the total parity is at its release level of 100.00% and senior parity is at 104.57%. Cash is being released from the trust given the trust has reached its release level threshold.

Adequate Liquidity Support

Liquidity support is provided by a reserve account which is determined as the greater of 0.25% of the pool balance and $1,828,029.

Acceptable Servicing Capabilities:

Navient Solutions, Inc. (formerly known as Sallie Mae, Inc.) is the servicer of the trust’s student loan pool. In Fitch’s opinion, Navient Solutions, Inc. is an acceptable servicer of FFELP student loans.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Since FFELP student loan ABS rely on the U.S. government to reimburse defaults, ‘AAAsf’ FFELP ABS ratings will likely move in tandem with the ‘AAA’ U.S. sovereign rating. Aside from the U.S. sovereign rating, defaults and basis risk account for the majority of the risk embedded in FFELP student loan transactions. Additional defaults and basis shock beyond Fitch’s published stresses could result in future downgrades. Likewise, a buildup of credit enhancement driven by positive excess spread given favorable basis factor conditions could lead to future upgrades.

Fitch has affirmed the following ratings:

SLC Student Loan Trust Series 2005-3

–Class A-2 notes at ‘AAAsf’; Outlook Stable;

–Class A-3 notes at ‘AAAsf’; Outlook Stable;

–Class A-4 notes at ‘AAAsf’; Outlook Stable;

–Class B note at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable.

Additional information is available at ‘www.fitchratings.com‘.

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

–‘Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria’ dated May 20, 2014;

–‘Rating U.S. Federal Family Education Loan Program Student Loan ABS Criteria’ dated June 23, 2014.

Additional Disclosure

Solicitation Status

http://www.fitchratings.com/gws/en/disclosure/solicitation?pr_id=961515

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTP://FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY’S PUBLIC WEBSITE ‘WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM‘. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH’S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE ‘CODE OF CONDUCT’ SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.

Security Upgrades & DowngradesFinanceFitch Ratings Contact:

Fitch Ratings

Primary Analyst

Lisette Figueroa

+1-212-908-0836

Fitch Ratings, Inc.

33 Whitehall St.

New York, NY 10004

or

Committee Chairperson

Tracy Wan

Senior Director

+1-212-908-9171

or

Media Relations:

Elizabeth Fogerty,+1-212-908-0526

elizabeth.fogerty@fitchratings.com […]