Categories

A sample text widget

Etiam pulvinar consectetur dolor sed malesuada. Ut convallis euismod dolor nec pretium. Nunc ut tristique massa.

Nam sodales mi vitae dolor ullamcorper et vulputate enim accumsan. Morbi orci magna, tincidunt vitae molestie nec, molestie at mi. Nulla nulla lorem, suscipit in posuere in, interdum non magna.

Fitch Rates Dryden 37 Senior Loan Fund/LLC

CHICAGO–(BUSINESS WIRE)–

Fitch Ratings assigns the following rating and Rating Outlook to Dryden 37 Senior Loan Fund/LLC:

–$320,000,000 class A notes ‘AAAsf’; Outlook Stable.

Fitch does not rate the class B, C, D, E, F or subordinated notes.

TRANSACTION SUMMARY

Dryden 37 Senior Loan Fund (the issuer) and Dryden 37 Senior Loan Fund LLC (the co-issuer) represent an arbitrage cash flow collateralized loan obligation (CLO) that will be managed by Prudential Investment Management, Inc. (Prudential). Net proceeds from the issuance of notes will be used to purchase a portfolio of approximately $500 million of leveraged loans. The CLO will have a four-year reinvestment period.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Sufficient Credit Enhancement: Credit enhancement (CE) of 36% for class A, in addition to excess spread, is sufficient to protect against portfolio default and recovery rate projections in the ‘AAAsf’ stress scenario. The level of CE for the class A notes is below the average for recent CLO issuances; however, cash flow modeling indicates performance in line with other ‘AAAsf’ rated CLO notes.

‘B+/B’ Asset Quality: The average credit quality of the indicative portfolio is ‘B+/B’, which is slightly better than that of recent CLOs. Issuers rated in the ‘B’ rating category denote relatively weak credit quality; however, in Fitch’s opinion, the class A notes are unlikely to be affected by the foreseeable level of defaults. The class A notes are robust against default rates of up to 57.4%.

Strong Recovery Expectations: The indicative portfolio consists of 96.4% first-lien senior-secured loans. Approximately 89.5% of the indicative portfolio has either strong recovery prospects or a Fitch-assigned Recovery Rating of ‘RR2’ or higher, resulting in a base case recovery assumption of 76.1%. In determination of the class A note rating, Fitch stressed the indicative portfolio by assuming a higher portfolio concentration of assets with lower recovery prospects and further reduced recovery assumptions for higher rating stress assumptions. The analysis of Dryden 37 class A notes assumed a 34.7% recovery rate in Fitch’s ‘AAAsf’ scenario.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Fitch evaluated the structure’s sensitivity to the potential variability of key model assumptions including decreases in weighted average spread or recovery rates and increases in default rates or correlation. Fitch expects the class A notes to remain investment grade even under the most extreme sensitivity scenarios. Results under these sensitivity scenarios ranged between ‘A-sf’ and ‘AAAsf’ for the class A notes.

Sources of information used to assess these ratings were provided by the arranger, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, and the public domain.

Key Rating Drivers and Rating Sensitivities are further described in the accompanying new issue report, which will be available shortly to investors on Fitch’s website at ‘www.fitchratings.com‘.

For more information about Fitch’s comprehensive subscription service FitchResearch, which includes all presale reports, surveillance and credit reports on more than 20 asset classes, contact product sales at +1-212-908-0800 or at ‘webmaster@fitchratings.com‘.

Additional information is available at ‘www.fitchratings.com‘.

Applicable Criteria & Related Research:

–‘Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria’ (Aug. 4, 2014);

–‘Global Rating Criteria for Corporate CDOs’ (July 25, 2014);

–‘Criteria for Interest Rate Stresses in Structured Finance Transactions and Covered Bonds’ (Dec. 19, 2014);

–‘Counterparty Criteria for Structured Finance and Covered Bonds’ (May 14, 2014).

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=754389

Global Rating Criteria for Corporate CDOs

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=753057

Criteria for Interest Rate Stresses in Structured Finance Transactions and Covered Bonds

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=838868

Counterparty Criteria for Structured Finance and Covered Bonds

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=744158

Additional Disclosure

Solicitation Status

http://www.fitchratings.com/gws/en/disclosure/solicitation?pr_id=981238

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTP://FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY’S PUBLIC WEBSITE ‘WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM‘. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH’S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE ‘CODE OF CONDUCT’ SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.

Investment & Company InformationFinanceFitch Ratings Contact:

Fitch Ratings

Primary Analyst

Aaron Hughes

Director

+1-312-368-2074

Fitch Ratings, Inc.

70 West Madison Street

Chicago, IL 60602

or

Secondary Analyst

Cristina Feracota

Associate Director

+1-312-606-2300

or

Committee Chairperson

Derek Miller

Senior Director

+1-312-368-2076

or

Media Relations:

Sandro Scenga, +1-212-908-0278

sandro.scenga@fitchratings.com […]

Fitch Affirms SLM 2007-7 and SLM 2014-2 Trusts

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–

Fitch Ratings has affirmed at ‘AAAsf’ the senior notes issued by SLM Student Loan Trust 2007-7 and SLM Student Loan Trust 2014-2. In addition, Fitch affirms the subordinate notes for both trusts. The Rating Outlook remains Stable for both classes.

Under certain stress scenarios, SLM Student Loan Trust 2007-7’s class A-3 note misses its legal final maturity on April 25, 2017 based on Fitch’s cash flow runs. In such scenarios, this could result in a technical default where the note misses its maturity date although Fitch would expect ultimate repayment of full principal and interest shortly thereafter. Also, recent servicing agreement amendments dated Jan. 22, 2015 allow Navient Solutions (Navient) to make optional purchase up to 10% of the initial pool balance, which if exercised would help meet the maturity date.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

High Collateral Quality: The trust collateral consists of 100% Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP) loans. The credit quality of the trust collateral is high, in Fitch’s opinion, based on the guarantees provided by the transaction’s eligible guarantors and reinsurance provided by the U.S. Department of Education (ED) for at least 97% of principal and accrued interest. The current U.S. sovereign rating is ‘AAA’ with a Stable Outlook.

Sufficient Credit Enhancement (CE): While both the senior and subordinate notes will benefit from overcollateralization (OC) and future excess spread, the senior notes also benefit from subordination provided by the class B note. As of December 2014, total parity is 100% and senior parity is 107.72% (7.16% CE) for SLM 2007-7; 101.01% (1% CE) and 104.15% (3.98% CE) for SLM 2014-2. Cash will be released from both trusts given that the specified OC amount is maintained. For SLM 2007-7, the target is 100% total parity; for SLM 2014-2 the target is the greater of 1% of the adjusted pool balance or $1.25 million.

Adequate Liquidity Support: Liquidity support for the notes is provided by a reserve account. The reserve for SLM 2007-7 is sized equal to the greater of 0.25% of the pool balance and $1,951,617; for SLM 2014-2, the reserve is sized equal to the greater of 0.50% of the pool balance and $995,345. On or after the April 2015 distribution date, the specified reserve requirement is reduced to 0.25% of the pool balance and $995,345.

Acceptable Servicing Capabilities: Navient Solutions, Inc. (formerly known as Sallie Mae, Inc.), as servicer, will be responsible for servicing both trusts. Fitch has reviewed the servicing operations of Navient Solutions and believes it to be acceptable servicer of FFELP student loans.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Since FFELP student loan ABS rely on the U.S. government to reimburse defaults, ‘AAAsf’ FFELP ABS ratings will likely move in tandem with the ‘AAA’ U.S. sovereign rating. Aside from the U.S. sovereign rating, defaults and basis risk account for the majority of the risk embedded in FFELP student loan transactions. Additional defaults and basis shock beyond Fitch’s published stresses could result in future downgrades. Likewise, a buildup of credit enhancement driven by positive excess spread given favorable basis factor conditions could lead to future upgrades.

A comparison of the transaction’s representations, warranties, and enforcement mechanisms (RW&Es) to those of typical RW&Es for FFELP asset-backed securities is available in the presale appendix. This presale appendix and Fitch’s special report on ‘Representations, Warranties, and Enforcement Mechanisms on Global Structured Finance Transactions,’ may be accessed via the links provided below.

Fitch has taken the following rating actions:

SLM Student Loan Trust 2007-7:

–Class A-3 affirmed at ‘AAAsf’; Outlook Stable;

–Class A-4 affirmed at ‘AAAsf’; Outlook Stable;

–Class B affirmed at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable.

SLM Student Loan Trust 2014-2:

–Class A-1 affirmed at ‘AAAsf’; Outlook Stable;

–Class A-2 affirmed at ‘AAAsf’; Outlook Stable;

–Class A-3 affirmed at ‘AAAsf’; Outlook Stable;

–Class B affirmed at ‘A+sf’; Outlook Stable.

Additional information is available at ‘www.fitchratings.com‘.

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

–‘Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria’ (May 20, 2014);

–‘Rating U.S. Federal Family Education Loan Program Student Loan ABS Criteria’ (June 23, 2014);

–‘SLM Student Loan Trust 2014-2 — Appendix’ (Mar. 17, 2014);

–‘Representations, Warranties, and Enforcement Mechanisms in Global Structured Finance Transactions’ (October 31, 2014).

–‘Fitch Comments on SLM Omnibus Amendment to Servicing Agreements’ (Jan. 22, 2015).

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

Representations, Warranties and Enforcement Mechanisms in Global Structured Finance Transactions

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=799248

SLM Student Loan Trust 2014-2 — Appendix

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=741220

Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=754389

Rating U.S. Federal Family Education Loan Program Student Loan ABS Criteria

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=750530

Additional Disclosure

Solicitation Status

http://www.fitchratings.com/gws/en/disclosure/solicitation?pr_id=981234

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTP://FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY’S PUBLIC WEBSITE ‘WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM‘. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH’S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE ‘CODE OF CONDUCT’ SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.

FinanceInvestment & Company InformationFitch Ratings Contact:

Fitch Ratings

Primary Analyst

Paul Jiang

Associate Director

+1 212-908-9120

Fitch Ratings, Inc.

33 Whitehall St.

New York, NY 10004

or

Committee Chairperson

Tracy Wan

Senior Director

+1 212-908-9171

or

Media Relations:

Sandro Scenga, +1 212-908-0278

sandro.scenga@fitchratings.com […]

Fitch Affirms Nelnet Student Loan Trust 2008-4 Senior Notes & Upgrades Subs; Outlook Stable

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–

Fitch Ratings affirms the Nelnet Student Loan Trust 2008-4 senior notes at ‘AAAsf’ and upgrades the subordinate notes to ‘AAsf’ from ‘A+sf’. The Rating Outlook remains Stable on the senior notes, and the Outlook on the subordinate notes is revised to Stable from Positive . The upgrade of the subordinate notes is driven by strong static pool performance and amortization of the bonds.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

High Collateral Quality: The trust collateral is comprised of 100% of Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP) loans. The credit quality of the trust collateral is high, in Fitch’s opinion, based on the guarantees provided by the transaction’s eligible guarantors and reinsurance provided by the U.S. Department of Education (ED) for at least 97% of principal and accrued interest. Fitch rates the U.S. sovereign government at ‘AAA’ with a Stable Outlook.

Sufficient Credit Enhancement: CE is provided by overcollateralization (OC; the excess of trust’s asset balance over bond balance) and excess spread, and for the senior notes, subordination of the class B note. As of December 2014, total parity is 101% (0.99% CE) and senior parity is 109.03% (8.28% CE). The trust has been releasing cash as the cash release level of 101% parity has been maintained.

Adequate Liquidity Support: Liquidity support is provided by a Debt Service Reserve Fund currently equal to the greater of 0.25% of the pool balance and $1,326,612.08, currently at $1,384,630.74 as of December 2014.

Acceptable Servicing Capabilities: Nelnet Inc. (97.56%) and ACS (2.44%) are responsible for day-to-day servicing of the trust. Fitch believes both Nelnet and ACS to be acceptable servicers of FFELP student loans.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Since the FFELP student loan ABS relies on the U.S. government to reimburse defaults, ‘AAAsf’ FFELP ABS ratings will likely move in tandem with the ‘AAA’ U.S. sovereign rating. Aside from the U.S. sovereign rating, defaults and basis risk account for the majority of the risk embedded in FFELP student loan transactions. Additional defaults and basis shock beyond Fitch’s published stresses could result in future downgrades. Likewise, a buildup of credit enhancement driven by positive excess spread given favorable basis factor conditions could lead to future upgrades.

Fitch has taken the following rating actions:

Nelnet Student Loan Trust 2008-4:

–Class A-3 affirmed at ‘AAAsf’; Outlook Stable;

–Class A-4 affirmed at ‘AAAsf’; Outlook Stable;

–Class B upgraded to ‘AAsf’ from ‘A+sf’; Outlook to Stable from Positive.

Additional information is available at ‘www.fitchratings.com‘.

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

–‘Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria’ (Aug. 4, 2014);

–‘Rating U.S. Federal Family Education Loan Program Student Loan ABS Criteria’ (June 23, 2014);

–‘Representations, Warranties, and Enforcement Mechanisms in Global Structured Finance Transactions’ (Oct. 31, 2014).

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=754389

Rating U.S. Federal Family Education Loan Program Student Loan ABS Criteria

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=750530

Representations, Warranties and Enforcement Mechanisms in Global Structured Finance Transactions

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=799248

Additional Disclosure

Solicitation Status

http://www.fitchratings.com/gws/en/disclosure/solicitation?pr_id=981222

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTP://FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY’S PUBLIC WEBSITE ‘WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM‘. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH’S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE ‘CODE OF CONDUCT’ SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.

Investment & Company InformationFinanceFitch RatingsFFELP Contact:

Fitch Ratings

Primary Analyst

Eric Orenstein

+1-212-908-0245

Fitch Ratings, Inc.

33 Whitehall Street

New York, NY 10004

or

Committee Chairperson

Tracy Wan

Senior Director

+1-212-908-9171

or

Media Relations:

Sandro Scenga, +1-212-908-0278

sandro.scenga@fitchratings.com […]

Fitch Affirms Nelnet Student Loan Trust 2007-2 Senior & Sub Notes; Outlook Stable

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–

Fitch Ratings affirms the Nelnet Student Loan Trust 2007-2 senior notes at ‘AAAsf’ and the subordinate notes at ‘Asf’. The Rating Outlook remains Stable for both classes.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

High Collateral Quality: The trust collateral is comprised of 100% of Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP) loans. The credit quality of the trust collateral is high, in Fitch’s opinion, based on the guarantees provided by the transaction’s eligible guarantors and reinsurance provided by the U.S. Department of Education (ED) for at least 97% of principal and accrued interest. Fitch rates the U.S. sovereign government at ‘AAA’ with Outlook Stable.

Sufficient Credit Enhancement: CE is provided by overcollateralization (OC; the excess of trust’s asset balance over bond balance) and excess spread, and for the senior notes, subordination of the class B notes. As of November 2014, total parity is 100.13% (0.13% CE) and senior parity is 109.96% (9.06% CE). The trust has been releasing cash.

Adequate Liquidity Support: Liquidity support is provided by a Debt Service Reserve Fund sized at the greater of 0.25% of the pool balance and $2,201,253, currently equal to the floor.

Acceptable Servicing Capabilities: National Education Loan Network, as master servicer, and Nelnet Inc, as subservicer, are responsible for day-to-day servicing of the trust. Fitch believes both National Education Loan Network and Nelnet Inc. to be acceptable servicers of FFELP student loans.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Since the FFELP student loan ABS relies on the U.S. government to reimburse defaults, ‘AAAsf’ FFELP ABS ratings will likely move in tandem with the ‘AAA’ U.S. sovereign rating. Aside from the U.S. sovereign rating, defaults and basis risk account for the majority of the risk embedded in FFELP student loan transactions. Additional defaults and basis shock beyond Fitch’s published stresses could result in future downgrades. Likewise, a buildup of credit enhancement driven by positive excess spread given favorable basis factor conditions could lead to future upgrades.

Fitch has affirmed the following ratings:

Nelnet Student Loan Trust 2007-2:

–Class A-3L at ‘AAAsf’; Outlook Stable;

–Class A-4 AR-1 at ‘AAAsf’; Outlook Stable

–Class A-4 AR-2 at ‘AAAsf’; Outlook Stable;

–Class B1 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–Class B1 at ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable.

Additional information is available at ‘www.fitchratings.com‘.

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

–‘Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria’ (Aug. 4, 2014);

–‘Rating U.S. Federal Family Education Loan Program Student Loan ABS Criteria’ (June 23, 2014);

–‘Representations, Warranties, and Enforcement Mechanisms in Global Structured Finance Transactions’ (Oct. 31, 2014).

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=754389

Rating U.S. Federal Family Education Loan Program Student Loan ABS Criteria

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=750530

Representations, Warranties and Enforcement Mechanisms in Global Structured Finance Transactions

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=799248

Additional Disclosure

Solicitation Status

http://www.fitchratings.com/gws/en/disclosure/solicitation?pr_id=981221

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTP://FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY’S PUBLIC WEBSITE ‘WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM‘. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH’S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE ‘CODE OF CONDUCT’ SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.

FinanceInvestment & Company InformationFitch Ratings Contact:

Fitch Ratings

Primary Analyst:

Eric Orenstein, +1-212-908-0245

Fitch Ratings, Inc.

33 Whitehall Street

New York, NY 10004

or

Committee Chairperson:

Tracy Wan, +1-212-908-9171

Senior Director

or

Sandro Scenga, +1-212-908-0278

Media Relations, New York

sandro.scenga@fitchratings.com […]

Fitch Upgrades 7 Classes of Wachovia CRE CDO 2006-1

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–

Fitch Ratings has upgraded seven classes of Wachovia CRE CDO 2006-1, Ltd. (Wachovia CRE CDO 2006-1). Fitch’s performance expectation incorporates prospective views regarding commercial real estate market value and cash flow declines. A detailed list of rating actions follows at the end of this release.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

The upgrades reflect the significant delevering of the capital structure and Fitch’s better than average base case expected loss of 6.2% for the CDO. Since the last rating action, classes A though G have paid in full from the disposal of 19 loan or CMBS interests as well as asset amortization. There were no realized losses over the same period as all assets were removed or paid off at or above par. Further, in August 2014, the asset manager surrendered portions of classes B through N for cancellation. Between built par and the surrendered notes, the CDO is significantly over collateralized by $166 million, as of the Feb 2015 trustee report.

As of February 2015, CDO collateral consisted of the following: whole loans/A-notes (82%), CMBS (3.6%), and cash (14.4%). The approximately $40 million in principal proceeds are expected to be used to further pay down classes H through K.

The CDO collateral continues to become more concentrated. There are interests in approximately 14 different assets contributed to the CDO. The current combined percentage of defaulted assets and Loans of Concern is 38%.

Under Fitch’s methodology, approximately 68.1% of the portfolio is modeled to default in the base case stress scenario, defined as the ‘B’ stress. Modeled recoveries are well above average due to the, generally, stabilized nature of the collateral and the senior position of the majority of the debt.

The largest contributor to base case loss is a whole loan (20.6% of the pool) secured by a 402,000 sf retail center located in Glen Mills, PA. As of 9/30/14, occupancy was 96.7%. The largest tenants are Home Depot through 2033 and Marshalls through 2018. The loan, which matures on March 31, 2015, is over leveraged and Fitch modeled a loss in its base case scenario.

This transaction was analyzed according to the ‘Surveillance Criteria for U.S. CREL CDOs’, which applies stresses to property cash flows and debt service coverage ratio tests to project future default levels for the underlying portfolio. Recoveries are based on stressed cash flows and Fitch’s long-term capitalization rates. The default levels were then compared to the breakeven levels generated by Fitch’s cash flow model of the CDO under the various defaults timing and interest rate stress scenarios as described in the report ‘Global Rating Criteria for Structured Finance CDOs’. The breakeven rates for classes H through O pass the cash flow model at or above the ratings listed below. Upgrades to classes M though O were limited due to the increasing concentration of the portfolio.

The Stable Outlooks generally the significant credit enhancement to the classes and positive cushion in the modeling.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

If the collateral continues to repay at or near par, classes may be upgraded further.

Wachovia CRE CDO 2006-1 is a CRE CDO managed by Structured Asset Investors, LLC with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., successor-by-merger to Wachovia Bank, N.A., as sub-advisor. The CDO exited its reinvestment period in September 2011.

Fitch upgrades the following classes as indicated:

–$15 million class H notes to ‘AAAsf’ from ‘Asf’; Outlook Stable;

–$13 million class J notes to ‘AAAsf’ from ‘BBBsf’; Outlook Stable;

–$10.95 million class K notes to ‘AAAsf’ from ‘BBBsf’; Outlook Stable;

–$5 million class L notes to ‘AAAsf’ from ‘BBBsf’; Outlook Stable;

–$21.75 million class M notes to ‘Asf’ from ‘BBsf’; Outlook Stable;

–$6.9 million class N notes to ‘Asf’ from ‘Bsf’; Outlook Stable;

–$6.5 million class O notes to ‘Asf’ from ‘Bsf’; Outlook Stable.

Classes A through G have paid in full. The preferred shares are not rated.

Additional information is available at ‘www.fitchratings.com‘.

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

–‘Surveillance Criteria for U.S. CREL CDOs’ (November 2014);

–‘Global Rating Criteria for Structured Finance CDOs’ (July 2014);

–‘Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria’ (August 2014).

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

Surveillance Criteria for U.S. CREL CDOs

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=811268

Global Rating Criteria for Structured Finance CDOs

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=751136

Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=754389

Additional Disclosure

Solicitation Status

http://www.fitchratings.com/gws/en/disclosure/solicitation?pr_id=981153

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTP://FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY’S PUBLIC WEBSITE ‘WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM‘. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH’S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE ‘CODE OF CONDUCT’ SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.

Investment & Company InformationFinanceFitch RatingsCDO Contact:

Fitch Ratings

Primary Surveillance Analyst

Stacey McGovern

Director

+1-212-908-0722

Fitch Ratings, Inc.

33 Whitehall Street

New York, NY 10004

or

Committee Chairperson

Mary MacNeill

Managing Director

+1-212-908-0785

or

Media Relations

Sandro Scenga, +1 212-908-0278

sandro.scenga@fitchratings.com […]

Fitch Assigns Final Ratings to Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust 2015-2

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–

Link to Fitch Ratings’ Report: Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust 2015-2 — Appendix

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=863049

Fitch Ratings has assigned the following ratings and Outlooks to two groups in Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust 2015-2:

Group 1 Securities

–$75,728,000 class 1A1 ‘BBBsf’; Outlook Stable;

–$77,368,033 initial exchangeable class 1A2 not rated;

–$9,678,000 subsequent exchangeable class 1A3 ‘BBsf’; Outlook Stable;

–$9,072,000 subsequent exchangeable class 1A4 ‘Bsf’; Outlook Stable;

–$58,618,033 subsequent exchangeable class 1A5 not rated;

–$18,750,000 subsequent exchangeable class 1A6 ‘Bsf’; Outlook Stable;

–$43,964,000 subsequent exchangeable class 1A7 not rated;

–$14,654,033 subsequent exchangeable class 1A8 not rated.

Group 2 Securities

–$26,758,000 class 2A1 ‘BBBsf’; Outlook Stable;

–$12,569,031 class 2A2 not rated.

CMLTI 2015-2 is comprised of five groups. Fitch is rating five bonds from two of the groups. Two of the rated classes are the most senior tranche while the other three are subsequent exchangeable securities from group 1. Each group is a resecuritization of an ownership interest in a residential mortgage-backed security. As a resecuritization, the securities will receive their cash-flow from the underlying security. The Fitch-rated groups are collateralized with a senior class from Alt-A transactions issued from 2006 to 2007. Collateral performance has shown improvement over the past few years. The underlying pools have exhibited significant declines in the percentage of loans seriously delinquent. Also, the percentage of loans transitioning from current to delinquent has slowed as well.

For the Fitch rated groups, interest is paid pro-rata and principal is paid sequentially. Realized losses are applied reverse sequentially.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Key rating drivers include the performance of the underlying pool as well as the collateral characteristics, such as sustainable loan-to-value ratio (sLTV), credit score and geographic concentration. For the Fitch rated groups, Fitch ran various prepayment speeds and loss timing scenarios in its analysis of the deal structure. This analysis was done to determine that the cash flow to the Fitch rated bonds would not be exposed to losses as a result of potential alternative cash flow timing stress scenarios.

Based on the collateral composition of the Group 1 underlying pool, Fitch assumed a base-case scenario expected loss (XL) of 34%. In the rating stress scenarios, Fitch assumed a ‘BBBsf’ XL of 51.33%, a ‘BBsf’ XL of 45.53% and a ‘Bsf’ XL of 40.13. Fitch ran these loss assumptions through 12 different interest rate, prepayment and timing scenarios and used the most conservative value to determine the required credit enhancement (CE). The required CE to support a ‘BBBsf’ rating is 50.54%, a ‘BBsf’ rating is 44.21% and a ‘Bsf’ rating is 38.29%. The lower CE compared to the XL is due to the underlying deal structure, which allows for excess spread.

Based on the collateral composition of the Group 2 underlying pool, Fitch assumed a base-case scenario XL of 20%. In the rating stress scenarios, Fitch assumed a ‘BBBsf’ XL of 33.8%. Fitch increased the model-expected loss severity on liquidated loans by 10% at each rating scenario to better reflect recent loss severity trends. Fitch ran the loss assumptions through 12 different interest rate, prepayment and timing scenarios and used the most conservative value to determine the required credit enhancement (CE). The required CE to support a ‘BBBsf’ rating is 31.96%. The lower CE compared to the XL is due to the underlying class, which still had roughly 3.5% of CE.

Fitch is assigning the ratings based on underlying pool collateral composition, the results of its cashflow analysis, review of final structure and supporting deal documents.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Fitch analyzes each bond in a number of different scenarios to determine the likelihood of full principal recovery and timely interest. The scenario analysis incorporates various combinations of the following stressed assumptions: mortgage loss, loss timing, interest rates, prepayments, servicer advancing and loan modifications.

The analysis includes rating stress scenarios from ‘CCCsf’ to ‘AAAsf’. The ‘CCCsf’ scenario is intended to be the most likely base-case scenario. Rating scenarios above ‘CCCsf’ are increasingly more stressful and less likely outcomes. Although many variables are adjusted in the stress scenarios, the primary driver of the loss scenarios is the home price forecast assumption. In the ‘Bsf’ scenario, Fitch assumes home prices decline 10% below their long-term sustainable level. The home price decline assumption is increased by 5% at each higher rating category up to a 35% decline in the ‘AAAsf’ scenario.

The group-to-bond association for the Fitch-rated groups are as follows:

–Group 1 represents a 100% interest in the Lehman XS Trust, Series 2007-7N class 2A1A;

–Group 2 represents a 20.70% interest in the Washington Mutual Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2006-AR15 Trust Class 1A.

Additional information is available in the ‘Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust 2015-2 Representations and Warranties Appendix, published Feb. 27 and available at ‘www.fitchratings.com‘.

Additional information is available at ‘www.fitchratings.com‘.

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

–‘Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria’ (May 2014);

–‘U.S. RMBS Master Rating Criteria,’ (July 2014);

–‘U.S. RMBS Surveillance and Re-REMIC Criteria’ (June 2014);

–‘U.S. RMBS Loan Loss Model Criteria’ (November 2014);

–‘Counterparty Criteria for Structured Finance and Covered Bonds’ (May 2014);

–‘U.S. RMBS Cash Flow Analysis Criteria’ (April 2014);

–‘Criteria for Interest Rate Stresses in Structured Finance Transactions and Covered Bonds’ (December 2014);

–‘Rating Criteria for US Residential and Small Balance Commercial Mortgage Servicers’ (January 2014).

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

Counterparty Criteria for Structured Finance and Covered Bonds

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=744158

Criteria for Interest Rate Stresses in Structured Finance Transactions and Covered Bonds

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=838868

Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=754389

U.S. RMBS Master Rating Criteria

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=750719

U.S. RMBS Surveillance and Re-REMIC Criteria

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=750110

U.S. RMBS Cash Flow Analysis Criteria

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=746027

Rating Criteria for US Residential and Small Balance Commercial Mortgage Servicers

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=731747

U.S. RMBS Loan Loss Model Criteria

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=810788

Additional Disclosure

Solicitation Status

http://www.fitchratings.com/gws/en/disclosure/solicitation?pr_id=980536

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTP://FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY’S PUBLIC WEBSITE ‘WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM‘. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH’S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE ‘CODE OF CONDUCT’ SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.

FinanceInvestment & Company InformationFitch Ratings Contact:

Fitch Ratings

Primary Analyst

Ryan O’Loughlin

Analyst

+1-212-908-0387

Fitch Ratings, Inc., 33 Whitehall Street, New York, NY 10004

or

Secondary Analyst

Grant Bailey

Managing Director

+1-212-908-0544

or

Committee Chairperson

Rui Pereira

Managing Director

+1-212-908-0766

or

Media Relations:

Sandro Scenga, +1-212-908-0278 (New York)

sandro.scenga@fitchratings.com […]

Fitch Rates Navient Student Loan Trust 2015-1

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–

Fitch Ratings assigns ratings to Navient Student Loan Trust 2015-1 as follows:

–$343,600,000 class A-1 notes ‘AAAsf’; Outlook Stable;

–$629,700,000 class A-2 notes ‘AAAsf’; Outlook Stable;

–$26,700,000 class B notes ‘A+sf’; Outlook Stable.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

High Collateral Quality: The trust collateral consists of Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP) loans, including approximately 15.1% of rehab loans, with guaranties provided by eligible guarantors and reinsurance provided by the U.S. Department of Education (ED) for at least 97% of principal and accrued interest. Fitch currently rates the U.S. at ‘AAA’/Stable.

Sufficient Credit Enhancement: Cash flow scenarios for the class A and B notes were satisfactory under Fitch’s ‘AAAsf’ and ‘A+sf’ stresses, respectively. Credit enhancement (CE) is provided by overcollateralization (OC), excess spread and, for the class A notes, approximately 2.67% of subordination provided by the class B notes. A target OC amount equal to the greater of 1.50% of the adjusted pool balance and $3.0 million must be met before excess cash can be released.

Adequate Liquidity Support: Liquidity support is provided by a reserve account sized at 1.65% of the initial student loan balance which is funded at closing. The required reserve account balance for any distribution dates prior to May 25, 2016 (the step-down date) is 1.65% of the current student loan balance. Thereafter, the requirement will be the greater of 0.25% of the current student loan balance and 0.10% of the initial student loan balance.

Acceptable Servicing Capabilities: Navient Solutions, Inc. (formerly known as Sallie Mae, Inc.) will service 100% of the trust’s student loan pool. In Fitch’s opinion, Navient Solutions, Inc. is an acceptable servicer of FFELP student loans.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Since FFELP student loan ABS rely on the U.S. government to reimburse defaults, ‘AAAsf’ FFELP ABS ratings will likely move in tandem with the ‘AAA’ U.S. sovereign rating. Aside from the U.S. sovereign rating, defaults and basis risk account for the majority of the risk embedded in FFELP student loan transactions. Additional defaults and basis shock beyond Fitch’s published stresses could result in future downgrades. Likewise, a buildup of CE driven by positive excess spread given favorable basis factor conditions could lead to future upgrades.

Key Rating Drivers and Rating Sensitivities are further described in the pre-sale report titled ‘Navient Student Loan Trust 2015-1’, and for a further discussion on the representations, warranties, and enforcement mechanisms available to investors in this transaction, please see the related presale appendix, dated Feb. 12, 2015, available on www.fitchratings.com, or by clicking on the link.

Additional information is available at ‘www.fitchratings.com‘.

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

–‘Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria’ (August, 2014);

–‘Rating U.S. Federal Family Education Loan Program Student Loan ABS Criteria’ (June, 2014);

–‘Representations, Warranties, and Enforcement Mechanisms in Global Structured Finance Transactions’ (October, 2014).

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=754389

Rating U.S. Federal Family Education Loan Program Student Loan ABS Criteria

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=750530

Representations, Warranties and Enforcement Mechanisms in Global Structured Finance Transactions

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=799248

Additional Disclosure

Solicitation Status

http://www.fitchratings.com/gws/en/disclosure/solicitation?pr_id=980410

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTP://FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY’S PUBLIC WEBSITE ‘WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM‘. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH’S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE ‘CODE OF CONDUCT’ SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.

FinanceFinancial AidFitch Ratingsstudent loan Contact:

Fitch Ratings

Primary Analyst

Nicole Edwards

Director

+1 212-908-9114

Fitch Ratings, Inc.

33 Whitehall Street

New York, NY 10004

or

Secondary Analyst

Victoria Ohorodnyk

Director

+1 212-908-0866

or

Committee Chairperson

Tracy Wan

Senior Director

+1 212-908-9171

or

Media Relations:

Sandro Scenga, +1 212-908-0278

sandro.scenga@fitchratings.com […]

Fitch Affirms Nelnet Student Loan Trust 2014-2 Notes; Outlook Stable

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–

Fitch Ratings affirms all outstanding notes issued from Nelnet Student Loan Trust 2014-2 (Nelnet 2014-2). The Rating Outlook on all outstanding notes remains Stable.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

High Collateral Quality: The trust collateral consists of 100% of Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP) loans, including approximately 24.77% of rehabilitated loans. The credit quality of the trust collateral is high, in Fitch’s opinion, based on the guarantees provided by the transaction’s eligible guarantors and reinsurance provided by the U.S. Department of Education (ED) for at least 97% of principal and accrued interest. Fitch currently rates the U.S. sovereign rating at ‘AAA’, Outlook Stable.

Sufficient Credit Enhancement: CE is provided by overcollateralization (OC; the excess of trust’s asset balance over bond balance) and excess spread. As of the December 2014 collection period, total parity is 101.27% and senior parity is 105.07%. Currently, cash is being released as the trust has reached the target OC release level of the greater of 1.25% of the adjusted pool balance and $2,000,000.

Adequate Liquidity Support: is provided by a $2.362 million reserve account as of the December 2014 collection period. On or after the August 2015 distribution date, the specified reserve requirement account will be sized at 0.25% of outstanding notes with $509,000 floor.

Acceptable Servicing Capabilities: As of December 2014, Nelnet, Inc. services approximately 65.01% of the 2014-2 portfolio. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency (PHEAA) (14.65%), Xerox Education Services, LLC (12.67%), and Great Lakes Education Loan Services Inc. (GLESI) (7.67%) service the remaining portion of the portfolio. In Fitch’s opinion, all servicers are acceptable servicers of FFELP student loans.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Since FFELP student loan ABS relies on the U.S. government to reimburse defaults, ‘AAAsf’ FFELP ABS ratings will likely move in tandem with the ‘AAA’ U.S. sovereign rating. Aside from the U.S. sovereign rating, defaults and basis risk account for the majority of the risk embedded in FFELP student loan transactions. Additional defaults and basis shock beyond Fitch’s published stresses could result in future downgrades. Likewise, a buildup of credit enhancement driven by positive excess spread given favorable basis factor conditions could lead to future upgrades.

Fitch affirms the following:

Nelnet Student Loan Trust 2014-2:

–Class A-1 notes at ‘AAAsf’; Outlook Stable;

–Class A-2 notes at ‘AAAsf’; Outlook Stable;

–Class A-3 notes at ‘AAAsf’; Outlook Stable;

–Class B notes at ‘A+sf’; Outlook Stable.

A comparison of the transaction’s representations, warranties, and enforcement mechanisms (RW&Es) to those of typical RW&Es for FFELP asset-backed securities is available in the presale appendix. This presale appendix and Fitch’s special report on ‘Representations, Warranties, and Enforcement Mechanisms on Global Structured Finance Transactions,’ may be accessed via the links provided below.

Additional information is available at ‘www.fitchratings.com‘.

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

–‘Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria’ (May 20, 2014);

–‘Rating U.S. Federal Family Education Loan Program Student Loan ABS Criteria’ (June 23, 2014);

–‘Nelnet Student Loan Trust 2014-2 – Appendix’ (March 3, 2014);

–‘Representations, Warranties, and Enforcement Mechanisms in Global Structured Finance Transactions’ (Oct. 31, 2014).

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria – Effective from 20 May 2014 to 4 August 2014

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=748821

Rating U.S. Federal Family Education Loan Program Student Loan ABS Criteria

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=750530

Nelnet Student Loan Trust 2014-2 — Appendix

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=738836

Representations, Warranties and Enforcement Mechanisms in Global Structured Finance Transactions

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=799248

Additional Disclosure

Solicitation Status

http://www.fitchratings.com/gws/en/disclosure/solicitation?pr_id=980267

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTP://FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY’S PUBLIC WEBSITE ‘WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM‘. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH’S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE ‘CODE OF CONDUCT’ SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.

FinanceInvestment & Company InformationFitch Ratings Contact:

Fitch Ratings

Primary Analyst

Charlene M. Davis

Director

+1-212-908-0213

Fitch Ratings, Inc.

33 Whitehall St.

New York, NY 10004

or

Committee Chairperson

Tracy Wan

Senior Director

+1-212-908-9171

or

Media Relations

Sandro Scenga

+1-212-908-0278

New York

sandro.scenga@fitchratings.com […]

Fitch Affirms Halycon Loan Advisors Funding 2014-1 Ltd./LLC

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–

Fitch Ratings has affirmed the class X, A-1, A-2 notes and the class A loans issued by Halycon Loan Advisors Funding 2014-1 Ltd./LLC (Halcyon 2014-1) at ‘AAAsf’. The Rating Outlook remains Stable.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

The affirmation is based on the stable performance of the underlying portfolio since the transaction’s inception in March 2014 and the credit enhancement available to the notes. As of the Jan. 5, 2015 trustee report, the transaction continues to pass all of its coverage tests and collateral quality tests, and there have been no defaults in the underlying portfolio to date.

The loan portfolio par amount plus principal cash is approximately $402.4 million, compared to the effective date target par balance of $400 million, resulting in an increase in credit enhancement levels for the notes and the class A loans. The weighted average rating has remained in the ‘B/B-‘ range, and Fitch currently considers 3.1% of the portfolio (including unsettled trades) to be rated in the ‘CCC’ category versus 7.5% in the indicative portfolio at closing, based upon Fitch’s Issuer Default Rating (IDR) Equivalency Map. The weighted average spread (WAS) has increased to 5.7% from 5.1% at closing, relative to the trigger level of 4.4%. The weighted average life (WAL) is 5.0 years, which is below the trigger level of 7.2 years. The portfolio (including unsettled trades) is invested in approximately 96.1% senior secured loans and 3.9% second lien loans. In addition, approximately 91.9% of the portfolio has strong recovery prospects or a Fitch-assigned Recovery Rating of ‘RR2’ or higher.

The Stable Outlooks reflect the expectation that the class X, A-1, and A-2 notes and class A loans have a sufficient level of credit protection to withstand potential deterioration in the credit quality of the portfolio, based on the results of the Fitch sensitivity analysis described below.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

The ratings of the notes may be sensitive to the following: asset defaults, portfolio migration, including assets being downgraded to ‘CCC’, portions of the portfolio being placed on Rating Watch Negative, overcollateralization (OC) or interest coverage (IC) test breaches, or breach of concentration limitations or portfolio quality covenants. Fitch conducted rating sensitivity analysis on the closing date of Halcyon 2014-1, incorporating increased levels of defaults and reduced levels of recovery rates, among other sensitivities.

Halcyon 2014-1 is an arbitrage, cash flow collateralized loan obligation (CLO) managed by Halcyon Loan Advisors 2014-1 LLC (a wholly owned subsidiary of Halcyon Loan Management, LLC). The transaction remains in its reinvestment period, which is scheduled to end in April 2018. During the reinvestment period discretionary sales within a 12-month period are limited to 25% of the portfolio balance, as measured by the balance at the beginning of the preceding 12-month period. Sales of defaulted, credit-risk and credit-improved securities are permitted at any time, including after the reinvestment period, with the sale of credit-improved assets subject to certain restrictions. The manager also has the ability to reinvest unscheduled principal proceeds and sales proceeds from the disposal of credit risk assets after the reinvestment period, subject to certain conditions.

The class A loans were issued at close and include a conversion option to be converted into class A-2 notes. Once the option is exercised, the aggregate outstanding amount of the class A-2 notes will be increased by the outstanding principal amount of the class A loans and the class A loans shall cease to be outstanding. The conversion option may be exercised only once and no class A-2 notes may be converted into class A loans. The class A-2 notes continue to have a zero balance.

This review was conducted under the framework described in the report ‘Global Rating Criteria for Corporate CDOs’ using the Portfolio Credit Model (PCM) for projecting future default and recovery levels for the underlying portfolio. Given the stable performance of the deal since closing, no updated cash flow modeling was completed. The current portfolio’s ‘AAAsf’ Rating Default Rate (RDR) and Rating Recovery Rate (RRR) outputs from PCM are 53.1% and 38.8%, respectively, versus an RDR of 53.6% and RRR of 38.6% for the indicative portfolio at closing.

Initial Key Rating Drivers and Rating Sensitivity are further described in the New Issue Report published on Aug. 6, 2014. A comparison of the transaction’s Representations, Warranties, and Enforcement Mechanisms (RW&Es) to those of typical RW&Es for that asset class is also available by accessing the reports and links indicated below.

Fitch has affirmed the following ratings:

–$1,575,000 class X notes ‘AAAsf’; Outlook Stable;

–$199,000,000 class A-1 notes ‘AAAsf’; Outlook Stable,

–$0 class A-2 notes ‘AAAsf’; Outlook Stable;

–$50,000,000 class A loans ‘AAAsf’; Outlook Stable.

Fitch does not rate the class B-1, B-2, C, D, E, F or subordinated notes.

Additional information is available at ‘www.fitchratings.com‘.

The information used to assess these ratings was sourced from periodic servicer reports, note valuation reports, and the public domain.

Applicable Criteria & Related Research:

–‘Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria’ (Aug. 4, 2014);

–‘Global Rating Criteria for Corporate CDOs’ (July 25, 2014);

–‘Counterparty Criteria for Structured Finance and Covered Bonds’ (May 14, 2014);

–‘Halcyon Loan Advisors Funding 2014-1 Ltd./LLC New Issue Report’ (Aug. 6, 2014)

–‘Halcyon Loan Advisors Funding 2014-1 Ltd./LLC – Appendix’ (Aug. 6, 2014).

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=754389

Global Rating Criteria for Corporate CDOs

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=753057

Counterparty Criteria for Structured Finance and Covered Bonds

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=744158

Halcyon Loan Advisors Funding 2014-1 Ltd./LLC

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=751434

Halcyon Loan Advisors Funding 2014-1 Ltd./LLC — Appendix

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=753097

Additional Disclosure

Solicitation Status

http://www.fitchratings.com/gws/en/disclosure/solicitation?pr_id=979255

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTP://FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY’S PUBLIC WEBSITE ‘WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM‘. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH’S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE ‘CODE OF CONDUCT’ SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.

Security Upgrades & DowngradesFinanceFitch Ratings Contact:

Fitch Ratings

Primary Surveillance Analyst:

Christine Choo, +1-212-908-0603

Director

Fitch Ratings, Inc.

33 Whitehall Street

New York, NY 10004

or

Committee Chairperson:

Alina Pak, CFA, +1-312-368-3184

Senior Director

or

Media Relations:

Sandro Scenga, New York, +1-212-908-0278

sandro.scenga@fitchratings.com […]

Fitch Affirms Kentucky Higher Education Student Loan Corp 2010 Trust

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–

Fitch Ratings has affirmed the class A-2 bond issued by Kentucky Higher Education Student Loan Corp 2010 Trust at ‘AAAsf’. The Rating Outlook remains Stable.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

High Collateral Quality: The trust collateral consists of 100% Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP) loans. The credit quality of the trust collateral is high, in Fitch’s opinion, based on the guarantees provided by the transaction’s eligible guarantors and reinsurance provided by the U.S. Department of Education (ED) for at least 97% of principal and accrued interest. The current U.S. sovereign rating is ‘AAA’ with a Stable Outlook.

Sufficient Credit Enhancement: Credit Enhancement (CE) is provided by overcollateralization (OC) and future excess spread. As of September 2014, total parity is 110% (9.09% CE). The trust is releasing cash as long as the specified OC (110% total parity) is maintained.

Adequate Liquidity Support: Liquidity support for the note is provided by a reserve account (0.25% of pool balance or $350,000).

Acceptable Servicing Capabilities: Kentucky Higher Education Student Loan Corp (KHESLC) is responsible for servicing the trust. Fitch believes KHESLC is an acceptable servicer of FFELP student loans.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Since FFELP student loan ABS rely on the U.S. government to reimburse defaults, ‘AAAsf’ FFELP ABS ratings will likely move in tandem with the ‘AAA’ U.S. sovereign rating. Aside from the U.S. sovereign rating, defaults and basis risk account for the majority of the risk embedded in FFELP student loan transactions. Additional defaults and basis shock beyond Fitch’s published stresses could result in future downgrades. Likewise, a buildup of CE driven by positive excess spread given favorable basis factor conditions could lead to future upgrades.

Fitch has taken the following rating action:

Kentucky Higher Education Student Loan Corp 2010 Trust:

–Class A-2 affirmed at ‘AAAsf’; Outlook Stable.

Additional information is available at ‘www.fitchratings.com‘.

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

–‘Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria’ (May 20, 2014);

–‘Rating U.S. Federal Family Education Loan Program Student Loan ABS Criteria’ (June 23, 2014);

–‘Representations, Warranties, and Enforcement Mechanisms in Global Structured Finance Transactions’ (Oct. 31, 2014).

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=754389

Rating U.S. Federal Family Education Loan Program Student Loan ABS Criteria

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=750530

Representations, Warranties and Enforcement Mechanisms in Global Structured Finance Transactions

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=799248

Additional Disclosure

Solicitation Status

http://www.fitchratings.com/gws/en/disclosure/solicitation?pr_id=979160

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTP://FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY’S PUBLIC WEBSITE ‘WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM‘. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH’S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE ‘CODE OF CONDUCT’ SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.

Security Upgrades & DowngradesFinanceFitch RatingsStudent Loan Contact:

Fitch Ratings

Primary Analyst

Paul Jiang

Analyst

+1-212-908-9120

Fitch Ratings, Inc.

33 Whitehall St.

New York, NY 10004

or

Committee Chairperson

Kevin Corrigan

Senior Director

+1-212-908-9156

or

Media Relations:

Sandro Scenga, New York, +1 212-908-0278

Email:

sandro.scenga@fitchratings.com […]