Categories

A sample text widget

Etiam pulvinar consectetur dolor sed malesuada. Ut convallis euismod dolor nec pretium. Nunc ut tristique massa.

Nam sodales mi vitae dolor ullamcorper et vulputate enim accumsan. Morbi orci magna, tincidunt vitae molestie nec, molestie at mi. Nulla nulla lorem, suscipit in posuere in, interdum non magna.

Dangers of applying for an online payday loan

As consumers move their financial activities online, applying online for a payday loan may seem like the natural thing for a cash-strapped person to do.

But you could be setting yourself up for a world of hurt, from paying exorbitant interest rates to having funds swiped from your bank account to being threatened by debt collectors. Just filling out an application could be enough to begin the harassment and thievery.

“Absolutely the worst thing you can do is apply for an online payday loan,” says Jay Speer, executive director of the Virginia Poverty Law Center.

Most online payday loan sites aren’t even operated by lenders. They’re run by “lead generators,” who seek your personal information, such as Social Security number, driver’s license number and bank account details. They then sell that information to lenders.

“Your email and telephone explode after that,” Speer says, as lenders vie to offer you cash. That can happen even if you live in one of the 15 states where payday loans are illegal.

Lenders aren’t the only ones in the market for your personal information. “There’s a good chance they sell to fraudsters — people who come after you months or years later,” he says.

Sandra Green (not her real name) has experienced this firsthand. The Virginia woman turned to online payday loans after her husband was injured and couldn’t work for two years. Their credit was damaged and they couldn’t get cash to pay their bills from traditional financial institutions.

Green took out several loans totaling $3,000 to $4,000 starting around 2010. The lenders that she received cash from took their payments from her bank account — but they weren’t the only ones. A company she had never heard of swiped money from her account, creating an overdraft.

She filled out a request for the bank to stop payment. That worked for about six months, and then the withdrawals started again. “People will change the identity of the company and then they’ll hit it (the account) again. Once they do this it’s a never-ending cycle,” she says.

Companies she’d never done business with would call her at work and at home, harassing her. One threatened to file papers with the local sheriff’s office if she didn’t pay immediately.

“They get really belligerent when you don’t do what they want you to do,” Green recalls.

She feared she’d wind up in bankruptcy because of the loans and finally sought help from Blue Ridge Legal Services, a Virginia legal aid society, in 2013. Blue Ridge connected her with the Virginia Poverty Law Center.

Speer says of online payday lenders: “These people are like sharks. If you give them some money it’s like throwing blood in the water.”

Payday loans are generally described as small, short-term loans. A consumer writes a check for the amount borrowed, plus a fee. The lender advances money against the check and the check is held until the next payday, when the loan and fees must be paid. Or, in the practice used by most online lenders, a consumer can grant the lender access to his bank account, and the lender electronically accesses the account to deposit money and withdraw payment.

Even paying back legitimate loans carries astronomical costs. Green took out a loan of $350. It took six weeks for her to pay it back, and she paid nearly $300 in fees.

Online payday loans boom
Her experiences are not uncommon. “Fraud and Abuse Online: Harmful Practices in Internet Payday Lending,” a 2014 study by the Pew Charitable Trusts, found online installment payday loans typically have an APR of 300 percent to more than 700 percent. Online lump-sum payday loans have a typical APR of 650 percent, or $25 per $100 borrowed per pay period. Exorbitant fees are also charged, and initial payments might not be applied to the loan’s principal.

Online payday lending is big business. Revenue tripled from $1.4 billion in 2006 to $4.1 billion, according to Pew.

Of the more than 250 online payday borrowers surveyed by Pew, almost 40 percent said their personal information was sold to a third party without their knowledge. Nearly one-third had an unauthorized withdrawal from their account.

Threats were common, with 30 percent of those surveyed saying they were threatened by an online lender or debt collector.

“Harassment and fraud are really concentrated in the online lending market,” says Nick Bourke, project director for Pew’s study on payday loans.

Part of the problem stems from the fact that there’s no control over who can get your information once you apply for an online payday loan. “People’s personal information can be spread far and wide,” Bourke says.

Even if the loans are fraudulent, a consumer’s failure to pay them may be reported to one of the three main credit bureaus, Speer says, which can impact a consumer’s ability to rent an apartment or land a job.

Many storefront payday lenders are fed up with the behavior of these online payday lenders.

“These unlawful lenders roam the Internet trolling for customers. They are scammers. They are fraudsters,” says Amy Cantu, spokeswoman for the Community Financial Services Association of America, which represents more than half of the country’s storefront payday lenders.

Though online payday lenders represent just one-third of the marketplace, 90 percent of payday lending complaints filed with the Better Business Bureau are aimed at them, according to Pew.

Self-regulation efforts
Association members vow to adhere to the organization’s best practices, which include complying with state and federal laws, being licensed in each state in which they do business and adhering to acceptable debt collection practices.

Some of the association’s larger members also have an online presence, she says, but those sites also adhere to the organization’s best practices.

Cantu says she understands that consumers with financial troubles may prefer the anonymity of the Internet when seeking cash, rather than walking into a storefront payday lender. But online lenders are supposed to only operate in the states that allow payday lending.

Her organization wants the federal consumer watchdog agency, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, to crack down on illegal lenders.

Agencies crack down
Already the CFPB and the Federal Trade Commission are stepping up action against fraudsters. In a joint news conference in September, the agencies announced they’d filed suit against two online payday lenders.

The CFPB sued Kansas City-based Hydra Group, while the FTC sued CWB Services, also based in Kansas City.

The CFPB received more than 1,300 consumer complaints about the Hydra Group.

At the news conference, CFBP Director Richard Cordray accused the Hydra Group of “running an illegal cash-grab scam to force purported loans on people without their prior consent. It is an incredibly brazen and deceptive scheme.”

Both the Hydra Group and CWB Services were accused of buying personal information, including bank account numbers, from lead generators. The companies would deposit money into consumers’ bank accounts without any signed agreements, and then make unauthorized withdrawals from the accounts. If a consumer complained, the companies would produce false loan documents.

In 15 months, the Hydra Group made $97.3 million in loans and collected $115.4 million from consumers.

Even if consumers closed their accounts, their information might have been sold to debt collectors, who then attempted to collect more money.

A federal judge temporarily shut down the Hydra Group, freezing its assets. The CFPB is requesting a permanent shutdown, along with penalties imposed upon the company and refunds made to consumers.

With CWB Services, the federal court froze the company’s assets and appointed a receivership and the FTC is requesting consumers’ money be refunded. The company had raked in $46 million in 11 months, said Jessica Rich, the FTC’s director of the Bureau of Consumer Protection.

Bourke says the CFPB should ensure that small loans are tailored to the borrower’s ability to pay them off and should provide more protection to consumers, particularly against illegal debt collection practices.

“The core of the problem is that payday loans don’t help people. They drive people further into debt and distress,” he says.

See related:Know your credit card fraudster

,

Know your rights under the Truth in Lending Act

,

New protections from financial ‘gotchas’ in 2015Dangers of applying for an online payday loanCFPB orders refunds for 98,000 subprime cardholdersFighting back against the growing threat of tax fraudFinanceLoanspayday loanbank account […]

Monarch Financial Reports Higher Income, Strong Loan Growth, and Declares Cash Dividend

CHESAPEAKE, Va., Jan. 30, 2015 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Monarch Financial Holdings, Inc. (MNRK), the bank holding company for Monarch Bank, reported improved fourth quarter and annual financial performance. The Board of Directors also announced a quarterly common stock cash dividend of $0.08 per common share, payable on February 27, 2015, to shareholders of record on February 10, 2015.

Annual 2014 highlights are:

Net income of $11,211,850, for Return on Equity of 10.95% Diluted earnings per share of $1.05 Cash dividends of $0.31 paid per share, up 29% from 2013 Loans held for investment grew $59.9 million, up 8.4% Non-performing assets at 0.28% of total assets Net Interest Margin was 4.25% $1.6 billion in mortgage loans closed, with 80% home purchases

Fourth quarter 2014 highlights are:

Quarterly net income of $2,683,163, up 24% Return on equity of 10.03% Diluted earnings per share of $0.25 Loans held for investment grew $58.9 million $446 million in mortgage loans closed with 69% home purchase

“We are pleased with our quarterly and annual financial performance, with very strong organic loan growth finally taking hold in the fourth quarter. Unlike many of our peers we have grown loans with our bankers, in our markets, and have not purchased loans to drive this growth. Mortgage production was in line with the previous year with our best year ever for purchase mortgage loan closings. We improved our performance in all three lines of business to include banking, mortgage, and wealth management,” stated Brad E. Schwartz, Chief Executive Officer. “Non-performing assets remained low, our margin improved due to asset mix and pricing discipline, and our capital grew stronger with our retention of earnings. The market has responded to our performance with price appreciation in our common stock that, when combined with the increase in our common stock dividends, produced a 14% total shareholder return for 2014.”

For 2014 net income was $11,211,850 compared to $11,091,007 for the same period in 2013, a 1% increase. The 2014 return on average equity (ROE) was 10.95%, and the return on average assets (ROA) was 1.13%. Annual diluted earnings per share were $1.05 compared to $1.08 in 2013, as our higher earnings were more than offset by the number of additional outstanding shares.

Net income was $2,683,163 for the fourth quarter of 2014 compared to $2,156,566 for the same period in 2013, a 24% increase. The quarterly annualized return on average equity (ROE) was 10.03%, and the annualized quarterly return on average assets (ROA) was 1.04 %, both metrics up from the same period a year ago. Diluted earnings per share for the fourth quarter were $0.25, up 25% from the previous year.

Total assets at December 31, 2014 were $1.07 billion, up 5% from the prior year. In 2014 loans held for investment grew 8% to $773 million and mortgage loans held for sale grew 48% to $148 million. The vast majority of the net loan growth occurred in the fourth quarter. Total deposits grew 3% to $919 million, with demand deposits growing $40 million or 15% for the year. Demand deposits now represent 33% of total deposits, an achievement driven by our dedicated cash management and banking office teams. While the current rate environment does not appropriately reward banks for a transaction-focused funding strategy, this strategy should deliver net interest margin protection when rates eventually rise.

“We are pleased to deliver over 8% quarterly and year over year loan growth. We are equally proud that we produced each and every loan and have not been tempted by participation loans or other loan purchase programs we see in the marketplace,” stated E. Neal Crawford Jr., President of Monarch Bank. “We continue to hire talented bankers and expect to continue expanding the banking team into 2015. Our Richmond and Peninsula expansion is driving quality loan growth and deposit growth while our cash management and private banking teams continue to focus on growing core deposits.”

Non-performing assets were 0.28% as of December 31, 2014 compared to 0.25% one year prior, and non-performing loans to loans held for investment were 0.37% compared to 0.31% one year prior. Non-performing assets were $3.0 million, comprised of $175 thousand 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest, $2.7 million in non-accrual loans and $144,000 in one parcel of other real estate owned that is already under contract for sale. The allowance for loan losses represents 1.16% of total loans held for investment and 311% of non-performing loans.

Average equity to average assets rose to 10.39% at year-end 2014, an increase from 9.73% one year prior. Cash dividends of $0.08 per share were paid in the fourth quarter of 2014, and a total of $0.31 per share was paid during the year, an increase of 29% over 2013. Total risk-based capital to risk weighted assets at Monarch Bank equaled 13.79%, significantly higher than the required level to meet the highest rating of “Well Capitalized” by federal banking regulators. We also already meet the new Basel III capital standards for a well-capitalized bank. Monarch was again awarded the highest 5-Star “Superior” rating by Bauer Financial, an independent third-party bank rating agency that rates banks on safety and soundness.

Net interest income, our number one driver of profitability, was flat for the year driven by the large volume of mortgage loans held for sale in the first six months of 2013 compared to the balances carried in 2014. These balances are driven by mortgage loan closings. Excluding the mortgage loans held for sale volatility, the net interest income from core banking operations increased 5.9% or $1.9 million. Our net interest margin for 2014 was 4.25%, up from 4.10% due to asset mix, loan and deposit pricing, mortgage loans held for sale pricing, fee income capture, and the additional income from loans previously on non-accrual status. Loan growth that occurred late in the year had minimal impact on net interest income even though it should contribute to net interest income on a going forward basis.

Non-interest income decreased $2.8 million in 2014 over the previous year driven by lower mortgage revenues, which was more than offset by a reduction of $3.6 million in commissions and incentives. Net overhead, or the difference between non-interest income and non-interest expenses, increased only $372 thousand or 1.7% due to increased spending for facilities, technology, technology risk management, compliance and marketing. Salaries and benefits were held flat for the year, a significant accomplishment with our increased benefits costs. Investment revenues related to Monarch Bank Private Wealth totaled $1.6 million for the year compared to $1.1 million the previous year, a noteworthy increase. The Company is recognized by Raymond James Financial Services as a top performing bank investment program, with $235 million in assets under management accumulated since the formation of Monarch Bank Private Wealth in the third quarter of 2012.

Mortgage revenue remains the number one driver of non-interest income. $446 million in mortgage loans were closed during the fourth quarter of 2014 (69% purchase) compared to $350 million in the fourth quarter of 2013 (80% purchase). Monarch closed $1.6 billion in mortgage loans during 2014 compared to $2.0 billion in 2012. While volumes year over year declined approximately 20%, revenues from mortgage lending declined only 5% due to a strong focus on loan product mix, secondary market pricing, and fee income.

“Our focus on the purchase market paid off in 2014 when we had the best year of purchase mortgage business in our history. We closed $1.3 billion in home purchase loans and $0.3 billion in refinances, and altogether closed over 6,000 loans during the year,” stated William T. Morrison, CEO of Monarch Mortgage. “The year 2015 is beginning with an attractive rate environment and a much stronger pipeline of activity, and we expect it to be a great year for our mortgage operations.”

Monarch Financial Holdings, Inc. is the one-bank holding company for Monarch Bank. Monarch Bank is a community bank with ten banking offices in Chesapeake, Virginia Beach, Norfolk, and Williamsburg, Virginia. Monarch Bank also has loan production offices in Newport News and Richmond, Virginia. OBX Bank, a division of Monarch Bank, operates offices in Kitty Hawk and Nags Head, North Carolina. Monarch Mortgage and our affiliated mortgage companies have over thirty offices with locations in Virginia, North Carolina, Maryland, and South Carolina. Our subsidiaries/ divisions include Monarch Bank, OBX Bank, Monarch Mortgage (secondary mortgage origination), OBX Bank Mortgage (secondary mortgage origination), Coastal Home Mortgage, LLC (secondary mortgage origination), Monarch Bank Private Wealth (investment, trust, planning and private banking), Monarch Investments (investment and insurance solutions), Real Estate Security Agency, LLC (title agency) and Monarch Capital, LLC (commercial mortgage brokerage). The shares of common stock of Monarch Financial Holdings, Inc. are publicly traded on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “MNRK”.

This press release may contain “forward-looking statements,” within the meaning of federal securities laws that involve significant risks and uncertainties. Statements herein are based on certain assumptions and analyses by the Company and are factors it believes are appropriate in the circumstances. Actual results could differ materially from those contained in or implied by such statements for a variety of reasons including, but not limited to: changes in interest rates; changes in accounting principles, policies, or guidelines; significant changes in the economic scenario: significant changes in regulatory requirements; and significant changes in securities markets. Consequently, all forward-looking statements made herein are qualified by these cautionary statements and the cautionary language in the Company’s most recent Form 10-K and 10-Q reports and other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company does not undertake to update forward-looking statements to reflect circumstances or events that occur after the date the forward-looking statements are made.

Consolidated Balance Sheets Monarch Financial Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries (In thousands) Unaudited

December 31, September 30, June 30, March 31, December 31,
2014 2014 2014 2014 2013 ASSETS:

Cash and due from banks $ 14,503 $ 21,083 $ 19,661 $ 18,510 $ 18,971 Interest bearing bank balances 49,761 58,207 37,166 37,033 31,955 Federal funds sold 1,135 3,938 29,761 84,232 53,985

Investment securities, at fair value 23,725 25,137 23,773 23,197 48,822

Mortgage loans held for sale 147,690 138,590 156,584 92,839 99,718

Loans held for investment, net of unearned income 772,590 713,667 700,159 715,088 712,671 Less: allowance for loan losses (8,949) (8,977) (9,070) (9,213) (9,061) Net loans 763,641 704,690 691,089 705,875 703,610

Bank premises and equipment, net 30,247 30,368 31,407 29,902 28,882 Restricted equity securities, at cost 3,633 3,179 3,169 3,156 3,683 Bank owned life insurance 9,687 9,587 7,526 7,467 7,409 Goodwill 775 775 775 775 775 Intangible assets, net — — 15 60 104 Accrued interest receivable and other assets 21,940 23,688 22,973 19,673 18,786 Total assets $ 1,066,737 $ 1,019,242 $ 1,023,899 $ 1,022,719 $ 1,016,700

LIABILITIES:

Demand deposits–non-interest bearing $ 235,301 $ 252,286 $ 240,348 $ 221,357 $ 206,891 Demand deposits–interest bearing 66,682 53,093 51,563 55,949 55,528 Money market deposits 369,221 365,041 377,096 367,590 374,462 Savings deposits 20,003 25,211 24,539 24,327 22,137 Time deposits 228,207 189,142 197,747 224,947 234,100 Total deposits 919,414 884,773 891,293 894,170 893,118

FHLB borrowings 1,075 1,100 1,125 1,150 1,175 Federal funds 10,000 — — — — Trust preferred subordinated debt 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Accrued interest payable and other liabilities 18,710 18,145 18,650 17,422 14,661 Total liabilities 959,199 914,018 921,068 922,742 918,954

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:

Common stock 51,864 51,735 51,624 51,584 51,432 Capital in excess of par value 8,336 7,966 7,675 7,357 7,069 Retained earnings 47,354 45,523 43,566 41,232 39,437 Accumulated other comprehensive loss (102) (135) (159) (314) (419) Total Monarch Financial Holdings, Inc. stockholders’ equity 107,452 105,089 102,706 99,859 97,519 Noncontrolling interest 86 135 125 118 227 Total equity 107,538 105,224 102,831 99,977 97,746 Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 1,066,737 $ 1,019,242 $ 1,023,899 $ 1,022,719 $ 1,016,700

Common shares outstanding at period end 10,652,475 10,646,873 10,624,668 10,619,444 10,502,323

Nonvested shares of common stock included in commons shares outstanding 279,750 299,910 299,910 302,710 215,960

Book value per common share at period end (1) $ 10.10 $ 9.87 $ 9.67 $ 9.40 $ 9.29 Tangible book value per common share at period end (2) $ 10.02 $ 9.80 $ 9.59 $ 9.33 $ 9.20 Closing market price $ 13.75 $ 12.56 $ 11.72 $ 12.26 $ 12.31

Total risk based capital – Consolidated company 13.79% 14.16% 14.29% 14.27% 13.91% Total risk based capital – Bank 13.81% 14.18% 14.31% 14.30% 13.95%

(1) Book value per common share is defined as stockholders’ equity divided by common shares outstanding. (2) Tangible book value per common share is defined as stockholders’ equity less goodwill and other intangibles divided by commons shares outstanding

Consolidated Statements of Income Monarch Financial Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries Unaudited
Three Months Ended Year Ended
December 31, December 31,
2014 2013 2014 2013 INTEREST INCOME:

Interest on federal funds sold $ 4,980 $ 42,283 $ 84,850 $ 115,963 Interest on other bank accounts 92,156 28,626 244,702 58,027 Dividends on equity securities 33,545 67,540 106,955 277,700 Interest on investment securities 100,957 60,311 359,604 230,496 Interest on mortgage loans held for sale 1,376,920 1,090,070 4,866,818 7,021,186 Interest and fees on loans held for investment 9,752,472 9,388,407 37,327,978 36,645,065 Total interest income 11,361,030 10,677,237 42,990,907 44,348,437 INTEREST EXPENSE:

Interest on deposits 722,537 905,970 3,185,965 3,936,203 Interest on trust preferred subordinated debt 46,337 122,850 416,233 491,910 Interest on other borrowings 16,615 15,002 58,966 358,345 Total interest expense 785,489 1,043,822 3,661,164 4,786,458 NET INTEREST INCOME 10,575,541 9,633,415 39,329,743 39,561,979 PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES — — — —

NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES 10,575,541 9,633,415 39,329,743 39,561,979

NON-INTEREST INCOME:

Mortgage banking income 16,210,774 13,276,836 62,440,013 65,672,402 Service charges and fees 489,974 502,373 2,058,262 1,941,926 Title income 216,895 124,774 669,785 789,253 Investment and insurance income 382,774 336,002 1,592,398 1,053,429 Other income 72,366 111,924 318,783 425,261 Total non-interest income 17,372,783 14,351,909 67,079,241 69,882,271 NON-INTEREST EXPENSE:

Salaries and employee benefits 8,798,996 8,772,157 34,134,998 34,112,834 Commissions and incentives 6,926,507 5,248,131 24,754,633 28,344,347 Occupancy and equipment 2,412,086 2,220,634 9,548,543 8,449,912 Loan expense 1,676,134 1,526,317 6,652,007 7,891,835 Marketing expense 990,383 807,717 3,111,535 2,873,259 Data processing 715,057 459,681 2,272,785 1,696,535 Telephone 296,396 314,984 1,226,389 1,184,894 Other expenses 1,789,789 1,212,731 6,778,966 6,357,202 Total non-interest expense 23,605,348 20,562,352 88,479,856 90,910,818

INCOME BEFORE TAXES 4,342,976 3,422,972 17,929,128 18,533,432 Income tax provision (1,616,093) (1,179,017) (6,490,273) (6,386,040) NET INCOME 2,726,883 2,243,955 11,438,855 12,147,392

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest (43,720) (87,389) (227,005) (1,056,385) NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO MONARCH FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC $2,683,163 $2,156,566 $11,211,850 $11,091,007

NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE:

Basic $ 0.25 $ 0.21 $ 1.06 $ 1.09 Diluted $ 0.25 $ 0.20 $ 1.05 $ 1.08

Weighted average basic shares outstanding 10,648,184 10,486,056 10,619,443 10,167,156 Weighted average diluted shares outstanding 10,689,219 10,535,313 10,658,600 10,299,471

Return on average assets 1.04% 0.86% 1.13% 1.07% Return on average stockholders’ equity 10.03% 8.88% 10.95% 11.97%

Financial Highlights Monarch Financial Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(Dollars in thousands, For the Quarter Ended except per share data) December 31, September 30, June 30, March 31, December 31,
2014 2014 2014 2014 2013 EARNINGS

Interest income $ 11,361 $ 10,639 $ 10,557 $ 10,434 $ 10,677 Interest expense (786) (928) (977) (971) (1,044) Net interest income 10,575 9,711 9,580 9,463 9,633 Provision for loan losses — — — — — Noninterest income – mortgage banking income 16,211 16,658 17,369 12,202 13,277 Noninterest income – other 1,162 1,241 1,130 1,106 1,075 Noninterest expense (23,605) (23,121) (23,007) (18,747) (20,562) Pre-tax net income 4,343 4,489 5,072 4,024 3,423 Minority interest in net income (44) (46) (121) (16) (87) Income taxes (1,616) (1,635) (1,767) (1,471) (1,179) Net income $ 2,683 $ 2,808 $ 3,184 $ 2,537 $ 2,157

PER COMMON SHARE

Earnings per share – basic $ 0.25 $ 0.26 $ 0.30 $ 0.24 $ 0.21 Earnings per share – diluted 0.25 0.26 0.30 0.24 0.20 Common stock – per share dividends 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 Average Basic Shares Outstanding 10,648,184 10,635,275 10,620,869 10,600,766 10,486,056 Average Diluted Shares Outstanding 10,689,219 10,670,507 10,660,217 10,641,782 10,535,313

ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

Beginning balance $ 8,977 $ 9,070 $ 9,213 $ 9,061 $ 11,228 Provision for loan losses — — — — — Charge-offs (174) (181) (184) (12) (2,252) Recoveries 146 88 41 164 85 Net charge-offs (28) (93) (143) 152 (2,167) Ending balance $ 8,949 $ 8,977 $ 9,070 $ 9,213 $ 9,061

COMPOSITION OF RISK ASSETS

Nonperforming loans:

90 days past due $ 175 $ 243 $ 499 $ 759 $ 472 Nonaccrual loans 2,705 2,180 3,028 1,718 1,740 OREO 144 767 144 302 302 Nonperforming assets 3,024 3,190 3,671 2,779 2,514

ASSET QUALITY RATIOS

Nonperforming assets to total assets 0.28% 0.31% 0.36% 0.27% 0.25% Nonperforming loans to total loans 0.37 0.34 0.50 0.35 0.31 Allowance for loan losses to total loans held for investment 1.16 1.26 1.30 1.29 1.27 Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans 310.73 370.49 257.16 371.94 409.63 Annualized net charge-offs to average loans held for investment 0.02 0.05 0.08 -0.09 1.25

FINANCIAL RATIOS

Return on average assets 1.04% 1.11% 1.29% 1.06% 0.86% Return on average stockholders’ equity 10.03 10.72 12.63 10.46 8.88 Net interest margin (FTE) 4.42 4.18 4.18 4.25 4.13 Non-interest revenue/Total revenue 60.5 62.7 63.7 56.1 57.3 Efficiency – Consolidated 84.5 83.7 81.8 82.1 85.5 Efficiency – Bank only 61.2 61.7 63.9 59.9 60.4 Average equity to average assets 10.39 10.40 10.18 10.13 9.73

PERIOD END BALANCES (Amounts in thousands)

Total mortgage loans held for sale $ 147,690 $ 138,590 $ 156,584 $ 92,839 $ 99,718 Total loans held for investment 772,590 713,667 700,159 715,088 712,671 Interest-earning assets 1,003,332 945,697 949,872 956,160 952,981 Assets 1,066,737 1,019,242 1,023,899 1,022,719 1,016,700 Total deposits 919,414 884,773 891,293 894,170 893,118 Other borrowings 21,075 11,100 11,125 11,150 11,175 Stockholders’ equity 107,451 105,089 102,706 99,859 97,519

AVERAGE BALANCES (Amounts in thousands)

Total mortgage loans held for sale $ 131,471 $ 138,382 $ 116,851 $ 70,856 $ 104,104 Total loans held for investment 725,093 701,137 698,851 704,917 695,074 Interest-earning assets 958,904 930,420 927,552 910,929 935,059 Assets 1,021,591 999,358 993,003 970,815 990,734 Total deposits 883,478 867,980 867,217 848,969 869,113 Other borrowings 14,575 11,124 11,150 11,174 11,199 Stockholders’ equity 106,088 103,908 101,092 98,374 96,415

MORTGAGE PRODUCTION (Amounts in thousands)

Dollar volume of mortgage loans closed $ 445,846 $ 440,784 $ 446,863 $ 271,233 $ 349,695 Percentage of refinance based on dollar volume 30.9% 16.0% 15.0% 19.1% 20.3%

Financials IndustryBanking & Budgetingmortgage loans Contact:

Brad E. Schwartz - (757) 389-5111, www.monarchbank.com

[…]

These loan officers took kickbacks

Thumbnail

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

Federal and state authorities have ordered Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase to pay a combined $35.7 million for taking part in a mortgage kickback scheme.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Maryland Attorney General said Thursday that loan officers at both banks took cash payments from a now-defunct title company in exchange for business referrals.

Regulators said more than 100 loan officers at Wells Fargo (WFC) locations in Maryland and Virginia steered thousands of loans to Genuine Title, which went out of business last year, in exchange for cash.

Related: Bank’s ‘repeated failures’ led to 2,000 foreclosures, feds say

Todd Cohen, a former Wells Fargo banker, allegedly had Genuine Title make “substantial cash payments” to his girlfriend at the time in order to avoid detection. The bureau has ordered Cohen and his now-wife, Elaine Cohen, to pay a $30,000 penalty.

Regulators said Wells Fargo failed to halt the scheme even though it was facing a federal lawsuit over the illegal activity.

“We have fully cooperated with the CFPB in this matter and have taken strong corrective action, including terminating team members,” Wells Fargo said in a statement.

The wrongdoing was less extensive at JPMorgan Chase (JPM). The bureau said at least six loan officers at Chase locations in Maryland, Virginia and New York helped steer 200 loans to Genuine Title. The bank has agreed to pay a total of $900,000 in penalties and compensation.

Related: U.S. Bank refunding $48 million to customers

“We are fully committed to ensuring that our mortgage bankers comply with all legal and regulatory requirements,” Chase said in a statement. “These former employees clearly violated our policies, procedures and training.”

The CFPB said a third bank also took kickbacks from Genuine Title. But the bureau said it did not bring an enforcement action against that bank because it “self-identified” and took steps to correct the illegal action.

“These banks allowed their loan officers to focus on their own illegal financial gain rather than on treating consumers fairly,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray.

First Published: January 22, 2015: 4:37 PM ET

[…]

Wells Fargo, JPMorgan settle mortgage kickbacks probe

WASHINGTON (AP) — Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase have agreed to pay more than $35 million combined to resolve claims that loan officers at the two banks received kickbacks in exchange for steering mortgage borrowers to a Maryland title company.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau said Thursday that JPMorgan and Wells Fargo each agreed to consent orders filed in federal court to settle the claims.

Wells Fargo has agreed to pay $24 million in civil penalties and $10.8 million to consumers affected by the scheme. JPMorgan is to pay $600,000 in penalties and about $300,000 in redress.

The CFPB and the Maryland attorney general found that loan officers at the banks referred borrowers to a now-defunct title company, Genuine Title, in exchange for cash and marketing services.

Federal law prohibits giving anything of value in exchange for a referral of business related to a real estate settlement service.

According to the CFPB, loan officers at Wells Fargo and JPMorgan sent homebuyers financing a mortgage through the banks to Genuine Title, which provided real estate closing services.

In return, the title company, which went out of business last April, provided the loan officers with cash, as well as consumer information and marketing services aimed at helping them drum up more loan business, the CFPB said.

“These banks allowed their loan officers to focus on their own illegal financial gain rather than on treating consumers fairly,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray.

The CFPB noted that more than 100 Wells Fargo loan officers in at least 18 branches, mainly in Maryland and Virginia, participated in the scheme, referring thousands of loans to Genuine Title.

The agency also contends that Wells Fargo failed to stop the scheme, even though it had multiple warnings of what was going on, including a federal lawsuit that alleged the bank’s loan officers had illegal arrangements with the title company.

In a statement, Wells Fargo spokesman Tom Goyda said the bank has fully cooperated with the CFPB, fired the employees who were involved in the scheme and taken steps to enhance its procedures to provide greater oversight and monitoring of both the process and its employees.

The agency found that at least six Chase loan officers in three different branches in Maryland, Virginia and New York were involved in the scheme.

Jason Lobo, a spokesman for Chase Mortgage Banking, said the bank’s own investigation into the kickback scheme found six of its mortgage loan officers received marketing services, though not any cash, in return for steering borrowers on 191 loans to Genuine Title.

“We also found no evidence that borrowers incurred title fees in excess of the market rates,” he said.

Four of the Chase loan officers had left the bank when the scheme was uncovered. The bank fired the two others who remained, Lobo noted.

FinanceLoansJPMorgan Chase […]

Subprime boom ties loans to car titles

The title lenders are seizing upon a broad retrenchment among banks, which have become wary of making loans to borrowers on the fringe of the financial system. Regulations passed after the financial crisis have made it much more expensive for banks to make loans to all but the safest borrowers.

Read MoreRegulators press banks for more on auto loan exposure

The title lenders are also benefiting as state authorities restrict payday loans, effectively pushing payday lenders out of many states. While title loans share many of the same features — in some cases carrying rates that eclipse those on payday loans — they have so far escaped a similar crackdown.

In 21 states, car title lending is expressly permitted, with title lenders charging interest of up to 300 percent a year. In most other states, lenders can make loans with cars as collateral, but at lower interest rates.

Seeing the regulatory landscape shift, some of the country’s largest payday lenders are switching gears. When Arizona effectively outlawed payday loans, ACE Cash Express registered its payday loan storefronts in the state as car title lenders, state records show.

Lenders made similar changes in Virginia, where lawmakers outlawed payday lending in 2010. But title lenders were untouched by that law and have expanded throughout the state, drawing business from Maryland.

The number of stores offering title loans in Virginia increased by 24 percent from 2012 to 2013, according to state records. Last year, the lenders made 177,775 loans, up roughly 612 percent from 2010, when the state banned payday lending.

In Tennessee, the number of title lending stores increased by about 22 percent from 2011 to 2013, reaching 1,017.

That is a small fraction of the industry’s overall size, state regulators say, because only a handful of states keep statistics. Legal aid offices in Arizona, California, Georgia, Missouri, Texas and Virginia report that they have experienced an influx of clients who have run into trouble with the loans.

“The demand is there for people who are desperate for money,” said Jay Speer, the executive director of the Virginia Poverty Law Center.

Loopholes and Adversity

When Tiffany Capone suggested that her fiancé, Michael, take out a $10,000 TitleMax loan with a 119 percent interest rate, she figured it would be a temporary fix to pay the bills. But this summer, after Michael fell behind on the loan payments, the couple’s three-year-old Hyundai was repossessed.

“It had my child’s car seat in the back,” said Ms. Capone, of Olney, Md.

With their car gone, the couple had to sell most of their furniture and other belongings to a pawnshop so they could afford to pay for taxis to ferry Michael, a diabetic with a heart condition, to his frequent doctors’ appointments. The hardships caused by title loans are being cited as one of the big challenges facing poor and minority communities.

“It is a form of indenture,” said Robert Swearingen, a lawyer with Legal Services of Eastern Missouri, adding that “because of the threat of repossession, they can string you along for the rest of your life.”

Johanna Pimentel said she and both of her brothers had taken out multiple title loans.

“They are everywhere, like liquor stores,” she said.

Ms. Pimentel, 32, had moved her family out of Ferguson, Mo., to a higher-priced suburb of St. Louis that promised better schools. But after a divorce, her former husband moved out, and she had trouble paying her rent.

Ms. Pimentel took out a $3,461 title loan using her 2002 Suburban as collateral.

After falling behind, she woke up one morning last March to find that the car had been repossessed. Without it, she could not continue to run her day care business.

Pointing to such experiences, lawmakers in some states — regulating the industry largely falls to states — have called for stricter limits on title loans or outright bans.

In Virginia, lawmakers passed a bill in 2010 that institutes some restrictions on the practice, including preventing lenders from trying to collect money from customers once a car has been repossessed. That same year, Montana voters overwhelmingly backed a ballot initiative that capped rates on title loans at 36 percent.

But for every state where there has been a crackdown, there are more where the industry has mobilized to beat back regulations.

In Wisconsin, it took the title loan industry only one year to reverse a ban on the loans that had been put in place in 2010. In New Hampshire in 2008, state legislators enacted a law that put a 36 percent ceiling on the rates that title lenders could charge. Four years later, though, lobbyists for the industry won a repeal of the law.

“This is nothing but government-authorized loan sharking,” said Scott A. Surovell, a Virginia lawmaker who has proposed bills that would further rein in title lenders.

Even when there are restrictions, some lenders find creative ways to continue business as usual. In California, where the interest rates and fees that lenders can charge on loans for $2,500 or less are restricted, some lenders extend loans for just over that amount.

Sometimes the workarounds are more blatant.

The City of Austin allows title lenders to extend loans only for three months. But that did not stop Mr. Chicosky, the veteran who borrowed $4,000 for car repairs, from getting a loan for 24 months.

Last year, after applying for a loan at a Cash America store in Austin, Mr. Chicosky said, a store employee told him that he would have to fill out the paperwork and pick up his check in a nearby town. Mr. Chicosky’s lawyer, Amy Clark Kleinpeter, said the location switch appeared to be a way to get around the rules in Austin.

The lender offered a different explanation to Mr. Chicosky. “They told me that they didn’t have a printer at the Austin location that was big enough to print my check,” he said.

[…]

Fitch Affirms Virginia Resources Authority's Airports Revolving Fund Revs at 'AA'; Outlook Stable

AUSTIN, Texas–(BUSINESS WIRE)–

Fitch Ratings has affirmed its ‘AA’ rating on the following bonds issued by the Virginia Resources Authority (VRA):

–Approximately $42.5 million in outstanding airports revolving fund revenue bonds.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.

SECURITY

The bonds are secured by loan repayments, investment earnings, and debt service reserve funds (DSRFs).

KEY RATING DRIVERS

SOLID FINANCIAL STRUCTURE: Fitch’s cash flow modeling demonstrates that the program can continue to pay bond debt service even with loan defaults in excess of Fitch’s ‘AAA’ liability default hurdle, as produced using Fitch’s Portfolio Stress Calculator (PSC). However, due to the high single-borrower concentration, the limited number of borrowers, and reduced recovery prospects, the rating is limited to ‘AA’.

SIGNIFICANT POOL CONCENTRATION: Pool concentration is significant, with the Capital Region Airport Commission (CRAC; airport revenue bonds rated ‘A-‘ with Stable Outlook by Fitch) accounting for 60% of the pool. The risk associated with CRAC is somewhat mitigated by the moral obligation (MO) pledge of the commonwealth of Virginia (the commonwealth), as specified below.

REDUCED RECOVERY PROSPECTS: The majority of the loans in the fund are secured by airport revenue pledges. If any defaults were to occur, recoveries are expected to be lower than those for traditional federally regulated state revolving fund programs, which typically consist of loans secured by tax-backed or utility system pledges.

PROFICIENT PROGRAM MANAGEMENT: VRA maintains solid loan underwriting guidelines and loan monitoring procedures, reflected by the fact that the program has not suffered a default to date.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

REDUCTION OF STRESS CUSHION: Significant reduction in aggregate borrower credit quality, increased pool or single-borrower concentration, or increased leveraging resulting in the program’s inability to pass Fitch’s ‘AA’ liability default hurdle could put downward pressure on the rating. The Stable Outlook reflects Fitch’s view that these events are not likely to occur over the next review cycle.

CREDIT PROFILE

The commonwealth of Virginia (the commonwealth) established its airports revolving fund program as a vehicle for local governments to access capital at below-market rates to fund infrastructure needs for aviation facilities. The revolving fund is meant to spur economic development through transportation improvements, specifically geared toward primary use and general aviation airports within the commonwealth.

FINANCIAL STRUCTURE EXHIBITS SOLID DEFAULT TOLERANCE

Fitch calculates the pool program’s asset strength ratio (PASR), which includes total scheduled loan repayments, account earnings and reserves divided by total scheduled bond debt service, to be adequate at 1.3x. The PASR is somewhat weaker than the 1.6x median level for comparable municipal pools rated by Fitch. On an annual basis, debt service coverage is projected to fluctuate between a low of 1.2x and high of 2.1x.

Due to the program’s available enhancement provided by reserves, account earnings, and surplus loan repayments, as described herein, cash flow modeling demonstrates that the program can continue to pay bond debt service even with hypothetical loan defaults of 100% in the first, middle and last four years of the outstanding bonds’ life. This is in excess of Fitch’s ‘AAA’ liability stress hurdle of 27%, as produced by the PSC. The liability stress hurdle is calculated based on overall pool credit quality as measured by the rating of underlying borrowers, size, loan term, and concentration. Per Fitch criteria, a 90% recovery is applied when determining default tolerance. Fitch notes that it ran additional recovery sensitivities in its modeling analysis due to the potential lower recover prospects as discussed herein.

Although the program passes Fitch’s ‘AAA’ liability stress hurdle, because of the program’s high concentration and reduced recovery prospects, the rating has been limited to ‘AA’.

LOSS PROTECTION PROVIDED PRIMARILY BY RESERVES

Bondholders are protected from losses primarily by a DSRF established for each borrower. Reserves are required to be maintained at the greater of 25%-40% of outstanding loans or maximum annual debt service. As of September 2014, the combined balance in the DSRFs currently totals about $14.2 million or 33% of outstanding bonds. Additional loss protection is also provided by loans made directly from program equity and pledged to bondholders (‘direct’ loans). Direct loan payments currently amount to approximately 3% of aggregate remaining bond debt service.

As bonds amortize, reserves in excess of the required amount for each participant are released to a general reserve fund (GRF), which may be used to finance any potential deficiency caused by another borrower’s loan default. The GRF is maintained at the difference between the actual balance in each DSRF and the current aggregate DSRF requirements. Any excess is recycled back into the airport revolving fund and may be used for additional (direct) loans.

POOL EXHIBITS SIGNIFICANT BORROWER CONCENTRATION

The loan portfolio is composed of only 20 participants; approximately 91% of the portfolio consists of loans secured by general airport revenues with the remaining 9% backed by general obligation or other pledge types. The largest borrower, CRAC, which operates Richmond International Airport, accounts for about 60% of total outstanding loan principal. CRAC’s obligations benefit from a MO commitment from the commonwealth to make up any deficiencies in the capital reserve account portion of CRAC’s DSRF.

The Charlottesville-Albemarle Airport Authority is the pool’s second largest borrower at just under 9%, while the pool’s next eight largest borrowers range in size from 1.9% to 5.3% of total pool principal. In aggregate, the top 10 borrowers represent 91% of the total pool, which Fitch considers high in comparison to similarly structured programs. The pool’s high concentration is largely a result of the limited number of potential airport borrowers within the commonwealth.

Overall, due mostly to a somewhat shorter weighted-average life, credit quality is stronger than that of similar municipal pools rated by Fitch, as reflected by an ‘AAA’ PSC liability stress hurdle of 27% versus Fitch’s median of 33% (lower liability stresses correlate to stronger credit quality).

PROFICIENT PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND UNDERWRITING

VRA administers and manages the airport revolving fund. Eligibility for projects must first be determined by the Virginia Department of Aviation and then be placed on a priority list before being brought to the VRA for credit analysis and loan approval. The VRA also conducts annual reviews of pool participants to ensure compliance with all loan agreements. Loan monitoring efforts also include monitoring payment receipts and identifying borrowers with potential cash flow problems. To date, the program has not experienced a default.

Additional information is available at ‘www.fitchratings.com‘.

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

–‘State Revolving Fund and Leveraged Municipal Loan Pool Criteria’ (April 28, 2014);

–‘State Revolving Fund and Leveraged Municipal Loan Pool 2013 Peer Review’ (Oct. 31, 2013);

–‘Revenue-Supported Rating Criteria’ (June 16, 2014).

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:

Revenue-Supported Rating Criteria

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=750012

State Revolving Fund and Leveraged Municipal Loan Pool (2013 Peer Review)

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=719991

State Revolving Fund and Leveraged Municipal Loan Pool Criteria

http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=746076

Additional Disclosure

Solicitation Status

http://www.fitchratings.com/gws/en/disclosure/solicitation?pr_id=889795

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTP://FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY’S PUBLIC WEBSITE ‘WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM‘. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH’S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE ‘CODE OF CONDUCT’ SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.

BondsSecurity Upgrades & DowngradesFitch Ratingscommonwealth of Virginia Contact:

Fitch Ratings

Primary Analyst

Major Parkhurst, +1 512-215-3724

Director

Fitch Ratings, Inc.

111 Congress Avenue

Austin, TX 78701

or

Secondary Analyst

Adrienne Booker, +1 312-368-5471

Senior Director

or

Committee Chairperson

Karen Krop, +1 212-908-0661

Senior Director

or

Media Relations:

Elizabeth Fogerty, +1 212-908-0526

elizabeth.fogerty@fitchratings.com […]

Announcing a New, Flexible Repayment Term, Low Rate Merchant Cash Advance Option Specifically Designed for Retail …

Thumbnail

Low Rate Merchant Cash Advance at BusinessCashAdvanceGURU.com

Small Business Working Capital at Low Rates, Care of Business Cash Advance Guru

Nationwide (PRWEB) July 24, 2014

For small businesses needing working capital, there’s now a low rate merchant cash advance available without hassle. This fast retail business cash advance loan comes with a low cost and flexible repayment terms. It’s an unsecured business loan and is the best poor credit merchant cash advance available on the market today.

Big banks are not lending working capital to small businesses, according to several recent news reports. The reason given is the wave of new federal lending and banking regulations stymieing the commercial loan market. Traditional lending institutions are in a precarious situation. Banks saddled with huge loan default losses, the result of the Great Recession. During the years 2008 through 2010 and even today, the trend of mortgage, auto loan, credit card, and small business loans defaults put banks hundreds of millions of dollars in the red.

Pressured by congressional members to make risky loans to prop-up the economy from 2004 through 2007, banks complied, only to take the devastating financial hit. The introduction of new legislation sought to curtail future risk, but only after the damage was inflicted.

Small businesses are adversely impacted by such events, having to provide years worth of financial documentation and tax returns, along with substantial collateral. Nearly perfect personal and company credit no longer guarantees commercial funding approval. Qualification standards are now out of reach for the majority of small businesses. Business loan application denial rates are near historic highs though banks continue to hoard billions of dollars in their reserves to weather federally mandated stress tests.

Alternative lenders are now stepping up to fill the commercial financing void, offering great and affordable loan products without a credit file review. This low cost, flexible repayment loan options are available by applying online. There are no application fees or hidden costs associated with these products. Companies can apply for and receive between $5,000 and $500,000 and be approved in just 24 hours. Funds are directly deposited in three to five business days and may be used for any purpose.

Current approval rates stand at 98 percent and monthly payments are based on a percentage of the loan amount rather than a fixed sum.

BusinessCashAdvanceGuru.com expanded nationwide services are now available in the following geographical areas:

Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, Washington DC, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.

About Business Cash Advance Guru
http://www.BusinessCashAdvanceGuru.com is a division authorized by TieTechnology, LLC. Business Cash Advance Guru’s merchant cash advance division specializes in helping small business owners realize their dreams. That’s why we created our merchant cash advance program in 2003, and continue to be a merchant cash advance leader in the industry, offering the most flexible payment options and the lowest interest rates and in the business.

About TieTechnology, LLC
http://www.tietechnology.com specializes in small business service based solutions for businesses. Services provided by TieTechnology LLC, include: merchant credit card processing, business service telecommunications, and web based visibility marketing. The advantages of doing business with TieTechnology is their commitment to customer service excellence and their offering of one stop solutions to all business to business service product needs for the customers’ convenience. To learn more about their wide assortment of business services and their specialized divisions, see the following links and descriptions.
fast retail business cash advance


[…]

Announcing a New Source for Reliable, Low Cost Retail Business Cash Advance Loans, Thanks to Alternative Lender …

Thumbnail

Retail Business Cash Advances Available

Available Low Cost Retail Business Cash Advance Loans, Thanks to Alternative Lender, BusinessCashAdvanceGuru.com

Nationwide (PRWEB) July 22, 2014

There’s never been a more straightforward and easy qualification retail business cash advance available to small businesses. With these merchant account cash advance loans, companies can access working capital without a credit check. Competitive merchant cash advance rates are available through this bad credit quick business cash advance program.

The five largest banks in the nation, recently surveyed by news media, state new federal regulations are the primary reason for the high percentage of small business loan rejections. Citing Frank-Dodd, along with previously enacted compliance laws, financing institutions deny commercial loan applications at historical levels. Banks undergo several “stress tests” each year, a result of the economic meltdown which gripped the nation beginning in mid 2008. Now, those same institutions hold billions of dollars in their reserves.

Small business owners with near perfect personal credit files and high company credit scores are routinely denied financing. Banks now require more than good credit. Small business loan approval requires substantial collateral and full disclosure of all personal and company assets and liabilities. In addition, applicant businesses must provide years of tax returns and scores of financial documents for verification. Personal guarantee notes are common and lengthy applications make funding complex.

Banks assert that hundreds of millions of dollars in defaulted consumer loans, ranging from lines of credit to mortgages, to auto loans, require heavier application scrutiny. Traditional banks are not providing access to working capital, still reeling from such large losses. Under pressure from congressional members to offer more financing options, banks are resisting.

However, innovative alternative lenders are filling the void. With new technology and easier lending standards, low cost loans are available without a credit check. No collateral is required, and there are no application fees. Application approvals stand at 98 percent and approval notification comes in just 24 hours. Funds are made available through direct deposit in three to five business days. Funds can be used for any purpose and rates are competitive. Payments are based on a percentage, rather than a fixed dollar amount. Loan amounts range from $5,000 up to $500,000.

BusinessCashAdvanceGuru.com expanded nationwide services are now available in the following geographical areas:

Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, Washington DC, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.

About Business Cash Advance Guru

http://www.BusinessCashAdvanceGuru.com is a division authorized by TieTechnology, LLC. Business Cash Advance Guru’s merchant cash advance division specializes in helping small business owners realize their dreams. That’s why we created our merchant cash advance program in 2003, and continue to be a merchant cash advance leader in the industry, offering the most flexible payment options and the lowest interest rates and in the business.

About TieTechnology, LLC

http://www.tietechnology.com specializes in small business service based solutions for businesses. Services provided by TieTechnology LLC, include: merchant credit card processing, business service telecommunications, and web based visibility marketing. The advantages of doing business with TieTechnology is their commitment to customer service excellence and their offering of one stop solutions to all business to business service product needs for the customers’ convenience. To learn more about their wide assortment of business services and their specialized divisions, see the following links and descriptions.


[…]

Introducing the Best New and Most Affordable Restaurant Merchant Cash Advance Loans Available on the Market Today …

Thumbnail

Available Restaurant Merchant Cash Advances

Easy Access Restaurant Working Capital, Thanks to Business Cash Advance Guru

Nationwide (PRWEB) July 13, 2014

Small businesses continue to struggle to find affordable financing options, even well-after the end of the Great Recession. Now, low cost restaurant merchant cash advance loans are available, thanks to alternative lenders. With competitive merchant cash advance rates, these online merchant cash advance options are the best and fastest merchant cash advance loans on the market today.

In the period lasting from mid 2008 through 2009 and into early 2010, the national economic downturn dampened commercial funding greatly. Tough economic circumstances led to a wave of loan defaults, which banks are in the processes of recovering from slowly. Hundreds of millions of dollars in mortgages, auto loans, student loans, credit card lines, home equity, and small business loans remain unpaid.

Making matters worse are dozens of new federal mandates and banking regulations. Small businesses are disproportionately harmed, as a result, with loan denials at near record highs. Loan applications are long and complicated; requirements are stricter and substantial verifications are now normal. In addition, applicant businesses must have near perfect credit and demonstrate the ability to repay in several ways. Loan qualifications are based on future profit and loss projections and personal and business assets and liabilities. Years of tax returns must be provided as well as certified financial statements.

Online merchant cash advance alternative lenders make commercial financing a simple process, not requiring credit history reviews or collateral commitments. In addition, there are no application fees or hidden costs. Approval rates are 98 percent and loan application approvals are delivered within 24 hours. Funds can be used for any purpose and are directly deposited in just three to five business days.

Restaurants can get the funding they need easily and make opportunistic buys, purchase new equipment, or expand their footprint. Businesses may borrow between $5,000 and $500,000, and poor credit is okay. Payment installments are based on a percentage of the loan, not a fixed sum, making these loans very affordable.

Tap into a merchant cash advance today and move business forward for a brighter future. Get funding fast with limited paperwork without a credit check or collateral. Simply fill out the online form to apply and qualify and receive funds in less than a week.

BusinessCashAdvanceGuru.com expanded nationwide services are now available in the following geographical areas:

Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, Washington DC, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.

About Business Cash Advance Guru

http://www.BusinessCashAdvanceGuru.com is a division authorized by TieTechnology, LLC. Business Cash Advance Guru’s merchant cash advance division specializes in helping small business owners realize their dreams. That’s why we created our merchant cash advance program in 2003, and continue to be a merchant cash advance leader in the industry, offering the most flexible payment options and the lowest interest rates and in the business.

About TieTechnology, LLC

http://www.tietechnology.com specializes in small business service based solutions for businesses. Services provided by TieTechnology LLC, include: merchant credit card processing, business service telecommunications, and web based visibility marketing. The advantages of doing business with TieTechnology is their commitment to customer service excellence and their offering of one stop solutions to all business to business service product needs for the customers’ convenience. To learn more about their wide assortment of business services and their specialized divisions, see the following links and descriptions.


[…]

A Background In Clear-Cut Plans Of Payday loans | ABC Gerontologie

That distinction is assigned to Modern Day Tom Walker, the predatory mortgage lender. And the criteria of documents differ from lender to lender. f you’re with limited funds, barely balancing the budget from pay check to pay check within the current economy, you might find yourself thinking about the services of a pay day loan or cash advancement lender. In fact, because payday lenders in Virginia are state regulated companies that create jobs and pay taxes, these are also be subject to strict rules governing their lending and collection policies. Of course, Tom Walker cannot have made as much money if the citizens of Boston weren’t such eager speculators.

When you end up picking one to use, just get registered with that lender and begin filling up the online application. When the money comes due, if you can’t repay, it is possible to ‘roll it over’ and extend it. You could transfer to multiple cards but that might be a hassle when it comes to keeping your bills organized and also covering 100% of what you need to transfer. The worst side of instant loans is the interest charge they attract. Just provide these details and get also pay day loans no document within your account directly within twenty four hours.

The basic things essential for such a preparation is practice. There are a great deal of facts that you have to know once you actually select the payday advances. Shop around, call and consult different lenders in your area. These are payday cash advances with no hassle because you require not tackle any problem while applying for such loans. As well no enterprise should hold on for a money inside a trust fund to cover back payday loans.

When you might have blemished credit, it’s often awfully tough to get a loan. If you’d like get the lowest interest rate loans, then getting a loan which is securedis your best bet in order to cut costs. People with high social obligations are commonly susceptible to such financial burdens. This will save you the financial institution fees you’d have incurred had your bank checking account become overdrawn. This is the interest number that Integrity Advance LLC, a pay day loan company is charging in interest on the online payday advances in Minnesota. To receive new information on TutustuTee hakemus kindly check out Siirry Lainakulutusluotto.fi sivulle

Reality: APR works best for long-term, not short-term loans. 100 day loans isn’t a fake program, it can however use a few shortcomings, through which we will attempt to explain. It is especially because these financing options come without the security. If you do not provide the credit back rapidly, the lent funds supplier are able to use the check you used as collateral. So if a cash advance lasts fourteen days and charges the borrower only once or twice, why are its applicable fees expressed in regards to one year.

[…]